Transient responses and adaptation to steady state in a eukaryotic gene regulation system

Understanding the structure and functionality of eukaryotic gene regulation systems is of fundamental importance in many areas of biology. While most recent studies focus on static or short-term properties, measuring the long-term dynamics of these networks under controlled conditions is necessary for their complete characterization. We demonstrate adaptive dynamics in a well-known system of metabolic regulation, the GAL system in the yeast S. cerevisiae. This is a classic model for a eukaryotic genetic switch, induced by galactose and repressed by glucose. We followed the expression of a reporter gfp under a GAL promoter at single-cell resolution in large population of yeast cells. Experiments were conducted for long time scales, several generations, while controlling the environment in continuous culture. This combination enabled us, for the first time, to distinguish between transient responses and steady state. We find that both galactose induction and glucose repression are only transient responses. Over several generations, the system converges to a single robust steady state, independent of external conditions. Thus, at steady state the GAL network loses its hallmark functionality as a sensitive carbon source rheostat. This result suggests that, while short-term dynamics are determined by specific modular responses, over long time scales inter-modular interactions take over and shape a robust steady state response of the regulatory system.

[1]  C. Brown,et al.  Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[3]  M. Carlson,et al.  Glucose repression in yeast. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[4]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[5]  Roger Y. Tsien,et al.  Improved green fluorescence , 1995, Nature.

[6]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[7]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[8]  M. Johnston,et al.  Promoter elements determining weak expression of the GAL4 regulatory gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  M. Johnston,et al.  Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[10]  P. J. Bhat,et al.  Transcriptional control of the GAL/MEL regulon of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanism of galactose‐mediated signal transduction , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  Margaret Werner-Washburne,et al.  The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation , 2002, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[12]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  Mark Johnston,et al.  5 Regulation of Carbon and Phosphate Utilization , 1992 .

[14]  G. Church,et al.  Identifying regulatory networks by combinatorial analysis of promoter elements , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[15]  A. Wilkins The Evolution of Developmental Pathways , 2001 .

[16]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[17]  W. Bentley,et al.  Green fluorescent protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: real-time studies of the GAL1 promoter. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  C. Paquin,et al.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations , 1983, Nature.

[19]  D. Lohr,et al.  Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[20]  R. Lenski,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  L. C. Robinson,et al.  Use of green fluorescent protein in living yeast cells. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[23]  A. Novick,et al.  Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Cells, Embryos and Evolution , 1997 .

[25]  I. Sadowski,et al.  Multiple Signals Regulate GALTranscription in Yeast , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  J. Hegemann,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression and subcellular localization in budding yeast , 1996, Yeast.

[27]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[28]  E. Davidson Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[29]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of the inducible divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.