Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic Tilt-Depth method

We compute the depth to the top of magnetic basement using the Tilt-Depth method from the best available magnetic anomaly grids covering the continental USA and Australia. For the USA, the Tilt-Depth estimates were compared with sediment thicknesses based on drilling data and show a correlation of 0.86 between the datasets. If random data were used then the correlation value goes to virtually zero. There is little to no lateral offset of the depth of basinal features although there is a tendency for the Tilt-Depth results to be slightly shallower than the drill depths. We also applied the Tilt-Depth method to a local-scale, relatively high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State. The Tilt-Depth method successfully identified a variety of important tectonic elements known from geological mapping. Of particular interest, the Tilt-Depth method illuminated deep (3 km) contacts within the non-magnetic sedimentary core of the Olympic Mountains, where magnetic anomalies are subdued and low in amplitude. For Australia, the Tilt-Depth estimates also give a good correlation with known areas of shallow basement and sedimentary basins. Our estimates of basement depth are not restricted to regional analysis but work equally well at the micro scale (basin scale) with depth estimates agreeing well with drill hole and seismic data. We focus on the eastern Officer Basin as an example of basin scale studies and find a good level of agreement between previously-derived basin models. However, our study potentially reveals depocentres not previously mapped due to the sparse distribution of well data. This example thus shows the potential additional advantage of the method in geological interpretation. The success of this study suggests that the Tilt-Depth method is useful in estimating the depth to crystalline basement when appropriate quality aeromagnetic anomaly data are used (i.e. line spacing on the order of or less than the expected depth to basement). The method is especially valuable as a reconnaissance tool in regions where drillhole or seismic information are either scarce, lacking, or ambiguous.

[1]  Madeline D. Lee,et al.  Effect of signal amplitude on magnetic depth estimations , 2010 .

[2]  R. Blakely,et al.  Saddle Mountain fault deformation zone, Olympic Peninsula, Washington: Western boundary of the Seattle uplift , 2009 .

[3]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Tilt-depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives , 2007 .

[4]  S. Cappelletti Section 2. The Historical Development , 2006 .

[5]  M. Nabighian,et al.  The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration , 2005 .

[6]  J. Fairhead,et al.  Comparison of grid Euler deconvolution with and without 2D constraints using a realistic 3D magnetic basement model , 2005 .

[7]  V. Lesur,et al.  Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures , 2004 .

[8]  Bruno Verduzco,et al.  The meter readerNew insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping , 2004 .

[9]  Ahmed Salem,et al.  A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data , 2003 .

[10]  A. B. Watts,et al.  Evolution of the intracratonic Officer Basin, central Australia: implications from subsidence analysis and gravity modelling , 2001 .

[11]  James Derek Fairhead,et al.  Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution , 2001 .

[12]  C. Swain Reduction-to-the-pole of regional magnetic data with variable field direction, and its stabilisation at low inclinations , 2000 .

[13]  R. Blakely,et al.  Fore-arc migration in Cascadia and its neotectonic significance , 1998 .

[14]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method , 1997 .

[15]  D. Ravat Analysis of the Euler Method and Its Applicability in Environmental Magnetic Investigations , 1996 .

[16]  C. W. Roberts,et al.  Regional extent of Great Valley basement west of the Great Valley, California: Implications for extensive tectonic wedging in the California Coast Ranges , 1995 .

[17]  Peter Milligan,et al.  Image Enhancement of Aeromagnetic Data using Automatic Gain Control , 1994 .

[18]  Vijay Singh,et al.  Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources , 1994 .

[19]  William A. Thomas,et al.  The Appalachian-Ouachita rifted margin of southeastern North America , 1991 .

[20]  A. Bally,et al.  The Geology of North America: An Overview , 1989 .

[21]  V. Vacquier,et al.  Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps , 1951 .

[22]  R. Blakely,et al.  Puget Sound aeromagnetic maps and data , 1999 .

[23]  I. W. Somerton,et al.  Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution , 1990 .

[24]  A. Bally Phanerozoic basins of North America , 1989 .

[25]  D. T. Thompson,et al.  EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data , 1982 .

[26]  W. M. Cady,et al.  The structure of the Olympic Mountains, Washington; analysis of a subduction zone , 1978 .