Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments.

Osmotically driven membrane processes are an emerging set of technologies that show promise in water and wastewater treatment, desalination, and power generation. The effective operation of these systems requires that the reverse flux of draw solute from the draw solution into the feed solution be minimized. A model was developed that describes the reverse permeation of draw solution across an asymmetric membrane in forward osmosis operation. Experiments were carried out to validate the model predictions with a highly soluble salt (NaCl) as a draw solution and a cellulose acetate membrane designed for forward osmosis. Using independently determined membrane transport coefficients, strong agreement between the model predictions and experimental results was observed. Further analysis shows that the reverse flux selectivity, the ratio of the forward water flux to the reverse solute flux, is a key parameter in the design of osmotically driven membrane processes. The model predictions and experiments demonstrate that this parameter is independent of the draw solution concentration and the structure of the membrane support layer. The value of the reverse flux selectivity is determined solely by the selectivity of the membrane active layer.

[1]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[2]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[3]  How Yong Ng,et al.  A novel hybrid forward osmosis - nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: Draw solution selection and system configuration , 2010 .

[4]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[5]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[7]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[8]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[10]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[11]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  J O S H U,et al.  Removal of Natural Steroid Hormones from Wastewater Using Membrane Contactor Processes † , 2022 .

[13]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[14]  H. Ng,et al.  Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .

[16]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Selective membrane transport , 1973 .

[17]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[18]  Qian Yang,et al.  Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[20]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[21]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[22]  A. Myerson,et al.  The diffusivity of potassium chloride and sodium chloride in concentrated, saturated, and supersaturated aqueous solutions , 1985 .

[23]  D. Yang,et al.  Theoretical investigation of hybrid desalination system combining reverse osmosis and forward osmosis , 2010 .

[24]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. , 1958, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[26]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[27]  V. Lobo,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[30]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  S. Loeb,et al.  Performance of permasep B-9 and B-10 membranes in various osmotic regions and at high osmotic pressures , 1978 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[33]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .