Selecting a semantic similarity measure for concepts in two different CAD model data ontologies

Semantic similarity measure technology based approach is one of the most popular approaches aiming at implementing semantic mapping between two different CAD model data ontologies. The most important problem in this approach is how to measure the semantic similarities of concepts between two different ontologies. A number of measure methods focusing on this problem have been presented in recent years. Each method can work well between its specific ontologies. But it is unclear how accurate the measured semantic similarities in these methods are. Moreover, there is yet no evidence that any of the methods presented how to select a measure with high similarity calculation accuracy. To compensate for such deficiencies, this paper proposes a method for selecting a semantic similarity measure with high similarity calculation accuracy for concepts in two different CAD model data ontologies. In this method, the similarity calculation accuracy of each candidate measure is quantified using Pearson correlation coefficient or residual sum of squares. The measure with high similarity calculation accuracy is selected through a comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficients or the residual sums of squares of all candidate measures. The paper also reports an implementation of the proposed method, provides an example to show how the method works, and evaluates the method by theoretical and experimental comparisons. The evaluation result suggests that the measure selected by the proposed method has good human correlation and high similarity calculation accuracy.

[1]  B. Gurumoorthy,et al.  A Feature-Based Framework for Semantic Interoperability of Product Models , 2008 .

[2]  G. Miller,et al.  Contextual correlates of semantic similarity , 1991 .

[3]  R. Doyle The American terrorist. , 2001, Scientific American.

[4]  Utpal Roy,et al.  Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  David Sánchez,et al.  A framework for unifying ontology-based semantic similarity measures: A study in the biomedical domain , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[6]  Samir Lamouri,et al.  Improving the interoperability of industrial information systems with description logic-based models - The state of the art , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[7]  David Weenink,et al.  CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[8]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[9]  John B. Goodenough,et al.  Contextual correlates of synonymy , 1965, CACM.

[10]  Parisa Ghodous,et al.  Semantic interoperability of knowledge in feature-based CAD models , 2014 .

[11]  Hyo-Won Suh,et al.  Semantic Mapping Based on Ontology and a Bayesian Network and Its Application to CAD and PDM Integration , 2006 .

[12]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems , 1999 .

[13]  David Sánchez,et al.  Ontology-based semantic similarity: A new feature-based approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Kyoung-Yun Kim,et al.  Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Sebastian Rudolph,et al.  Worst-Case Optimal Reasoning for the Horn-DL Fragments of OWL 1 and 2 , 2010, KR.

[16]  Euripides G. M. Petrakis,et al.  X-Similarity: Computing Semantic Similarity between Concepts from Different Ontologies , 2006, J. Digit. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Lijuan Zhu,et al.  Ontology-Driven Integration of CAD/CAE Applications: Strategies and Comparisons , 2009 .

[18]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[19]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics , 1999, LPAR.

[20]  Yong Tang,et al.  Feature-based approaches to semantic similarity assessment of concepts using Wikipedia , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Ernest Friedman Hill,et al.  Jess in Action: Java Rule-Based Systems , 2003 .

[22]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The description logic handbook: theory , 2003 .

[23]  Michele Dassisti,et al.  ONTO-PDM: Product-driven ONTOlogy for Product Data Management interoperability within manufacturing process environment , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[24]  Parisa Ghodous,et al.  Product Data Exchange Using Ontologies , 2002, AID.

[25]  H. Lan,et al.  SWRL : A semantic Web rule language combining OWL and ruleML , 2004 .

[26]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[27]  Lalit Patil Interoperability of formal semantics of production data across product development systems. , 2005 .

[28]  Chunyan Miao,et al.  Semantic enhancement and ontology for interoperability of design information systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007).

[29]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[30]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Placing search in context: the concept revisited , 2002, TOIS.

[31]  Yan Wang,et al.  Ontology-based feature mapping and verification between CAD systems , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[32]  Sebti Foufou,et al.  OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[33]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[34]  Lijuan Zhu,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Ontology Mapping Methods for Product Data in Engineering Applications , 2008 .

[35]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Ontology-based exchange of product data semantics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.