Understanding Wheel Spinning in the Context of Affective Factors

The notion of wheel spinning, students getting stuck in the mastery learning cycle of an ITS without mastering the skill, is an emerging issue. Although wheel spinning has been analyzed, there has been little work in understanding what factors underlie it, and whether it occurs in cultural contexts outside that of the United States. This work analyzes data from 116 students in an urban setting in the Philippines. We found that Filipino students using the Scatterplot Tutor exhibited wheel spinning behaviors. We explore the impact of an intervention, Scooter the Tutor, on wheel spinning behavior and did not find that it had any effect. We also analyzed data from quantitative field observations, and found that wheel spinning is negatively correlated with flow, positively correlated with confusion, but not correlated with boredom. This result suggests that the problem of wheel spinning is primarily cognitive in nature, .and not related to student motivation. However, wheel spinning is positively correlated with gaming the system, so those constructs seem to be related.

[1]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Software Agent on Student Affective Dynamics while Using ;an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[5]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  The Fine-Grained Impact of Gaming (?) on Learning , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[6]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  Theodore W. Frick,et al.  A Comparison of Three Decision Models for Adapting the Length of Computer-Based Mastery Tests , 1990 .

[8]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Is Over Practice Necessary? - Improving Learning Efficiency with the Cognitive Tutor through Educational Data Mining , 2007, AIED.

[9]  Steven Ritter,et al.  Optimal and Worst-Case Performance of Mastery Learning Assessment with Bayesian Knowledge Tracing , 2013, EDM.

[10]  Yue Gong,et al.  Wheel-Spinning: Students Who Fail to Master a Skill , 2013, AIED.