Emotive Language in Argumentation: Contents

[1]  G. Frege,et al.  On Sense and Reference , 2021 .

[2]  K. Fintel.  What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again? , 2008 .

[3]  M. Ephratt.  The functions of silence , 2008 .

[4]  E. Krabbe.  On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage , 2007, Pondering on Problems of Argumentation.

[5]  Victor Tadros.  Rape Without Consent , 2006 .

[6]  G. Simons.  The Use of Rhetoric and the Mass Media in Russia's War on Terror , 2006 .

[7]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence , 2005 .

[8]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[9]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution , 2005, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[10]  D. Walton.  Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions , 2005 .

[11]  Matthew Leigh.  Quintilian on the Emotions (Institutio Oratoria 6 preface and 1–2)* , 2004, Journal of Roman Studies.

[12]  Michael J. Maher,et al.  Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic , 2004, J. Log. Comput..

[13]  D. Zarefsky.  Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition , 2004 .

[14]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[15]  Adam Kramer.  Common Sense Principles of Contract Interpretation (and How We've Been Using Them All Along) , 2003 .

[16]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Double-Decker Definitions: The Role of Frames in Meaning Explanations , 2003 .

[17]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  How Students Argue Scientific Claims: A Rhetorical‐Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[19]  Gerhard Brewka,et al.  Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus , 2001, J. Log. Comput..

[20]  Pieter A. M. Seuren.  Presupposition, negation and trivalence , 2000, Journal of Linguistics.

[21]  K. Bach.  The Myth of Conventional Implicature , 1999 .

[22]  Kenneth T. Broda-Bahm.  Finding Protection in Definitions: The Quest for Environmental Security. , 1999 .

[23]  Charlotte Jørgensen,et al.  Public Debate – An Act of Hostility? , 1998 .

[24]  Bryan C. Taylor.  Nuclear weapons and communication studies: A review essay , 1998 .

[25]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition , 1998, J. Semant..

[26]  F. Kauffeld,et al.  Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing , 1998 .

[27]  R. Loui.  Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning , 1998, Comput. Intell..

[28]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Designing computer-based frameworks that facilitate doctor-patient collaboration , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[29]  B. Sweitzer.  Implicit Redefinitions, Evidentiary Proscriptions, and Guilty Minds: Intoxicated Wrongdoers after Montana v. Egelhoff , 1997 .

[30]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  On the Representation of Context , 1996, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[31]  S. Brewer,et al.  Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy , 1996 .

[32]  Keith Burgess-Jackson.  Rape and Persuasive Definition , 1995, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[33]  E. Schiappa.  Arguing about definitions , 1993 .

[34]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment , 1993, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[35]  T. Gordon.  The Pleadings Game , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[36]  Leo Hickey,et al.  Presupposition under cross-examination , 1993 .

[37]  C. Kauffman.  Names and Weapons. , 1989 .

[38]  E. Schiappa.  The rhetoric of nukespeak , 1989 .

[39]  Robert Hopper,et al.  How to do things without words: The taken‐for‐granted as speech‐action , 1981 .

[40]  R. Hopper.  THE TAKEN-FOR-GRANTED , 1981 .

[41]  D. Walton.  Omissions and other negative actions , 1980 .

[42]  D. Louisell.  Construing Rule 301: Instructing the Jury on Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceedings , 1977 .

[43]  J. Fodor,et al.  The structure of a semantic theory , 1963 .

[44]  P. Welsh.  On the Nature of Inference , 1957 .

[45]  W. B. Gallie.  IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts , 1956 .

[46]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  Act and Person in Argument , 1951, Ethics.

[47]  H. Hart.  XI.—The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights , 1949 .

[48]  A. Mostovaia.  Color words in literary Russian: Connotations and gender differences in use , 2009 .

[49]  N. Blokker.  Is the Authorization Authorized? Powers and Practice of the UN Security Council to Authorize the Use of Force by 'Coalitions of the Able and Willing' , 2000 .

[50]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Dialectical Relevance in Persuasion Dialogue , 1999 .

[51]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Semantics of Lexical Underspecification , 1998 .

[52]  D. Walton.  The speech act of presumption , 1993 .

[53]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics , 1992, J. Semant..

[54]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Coherence and Coreference , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Jim D. Mackenzie,et al.  Question-begging in non-cumulative systems , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[56]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Arresting circles in formal dialogues , 1978, J. Philos. Log..

[57]  K. Barwick.  ZUR REKONSTRUKTION DER RHETORIK DES HERMAGORAS VON TEMNOS , 1965 .

[58]  George Nakhnikian.  An Examination of Toulmin’s Analytical Ethics , 1959 .

[59]  B. Russell.  II.—On Denoting , 1905 .

[60]  Henry Prakken,et al.  DOI: 10.1017/S000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom Formal systems for persuasion dialogue , 2022 .