Durability of technologies in the keeping of ZEB’s performances

Abstract Durability is an important aspect that has not to be neglected in ZEB design. The requirements for buildings energy needs reduction and increase of renewable energy sources stimulated designers to integrate technologies in an efficient way. This ambitious goal must meet the capacity of the technical solutions to guarantee their performances over the years. The durability of materials and technologies is a topic that warrants further analyses in order to assess the proper efficiencies and the expected lifetime of a ZEB. Typically the energy balance of a ZEB is calculated by considering the annual energy flows or rarely the whole life cycle. The most used approaches consider constant performance of materials and technical elements over the lifespan. However, the performance loss of a single element can cause an imbalance in the behavior of a ZEB, for which persists a thin balance between inlet and outlet flows. The paper provides a critical point of view on this issue paying attention on the following technical solutions implemented in a case study for which the current scientific literature provides analysis on the degradation during their lifetime: glazing systems, VIPs, PV panels and GSHPs.

[1]  Italo Meroni,et al.  How to control the Indoor Environmental Quality through the use of the Do-It-Yourself approach and new pervasive technologies , 2017 .

[2]  Robert Fuller,et al.  Progress in ZEBs—A review of definitions, policies and construction activity , 2013 .

[3]  Italo Meroni,et al.  A Simplified Thermal Model to Control the Energy Fluxes and to Improve the Performance of Buildings , 2016 .

[4]  A. Campos-Celador,et al.  Energy and economic assessment of the envelope retrofitting in residential buildings in Northern Spain , 2015 .

[5]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Hourly Calculation Method of Air Source Heat Pump Behavior , 2016 .

[6]  Dirk C. Jordan,et al.  Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review , 2012 .

[7]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Estimation of building energy performance for local energy policy at urban scale , 2017 .

[8]  Efstathios E. Michaelides,et al.  Grid-independent residential buildings with renewable energy sources , 2018 .

[9]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application , 2013 .

[10]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Modeling energy refurbishment scenarios for the Hellenic residential building stock towards the 2020 & 2030 targets , 2016 .

[11]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Refurbishment design through cost-optimal methodology: The case study of a social housing in the northern Italy , 2017 .

[12]  Armin G. Aberle,et al.  PV module durability testing under high voltage biased damp heat conditions , 2011 .

[13]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Toward NZEB by optimizing HVAC system configuration in different climates , 2017 .

[14]  Arild Gustavsen,et al.  Aging effects on thermal properties and service life of vacuum insulation panels , 2011 .

[15]  Stephen Siu Yu Lau,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of active and passive design strategies for existing building retrofits in tropical climate: Case study of a zero energy building , 2018 .

[16]  Dirk Jordan,et al.  Compendium of photovoltaic degradation rates , 2016 .

[17]  Domenico Laforgia,et al.  Multi-objective optimization analysis for high efficiency external walls of zero energy buildings (ZEB) in the Mediterranean climate , 2014 .

[18]  Ilaria Ballarini,et al.  Refurbishment of the residential building stock toward the nearly-zero energy target through the application of the building typology , 2016 .

[19]  Staša Borović,et al.  Impact of grout thermal conductivity on the long-term efficiency of the ground-source heat pump system , 2017 .

[20]  Bjørn Petter Jelle,et al.  Vacuum insulation panel products: A state-of-the-art review and future research pathways , 2014 .

[21]  Yong Wang,et al.  An integrated predictive model of the long-term performance of ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems , 2018 .