Perception, knowledge, and practice of endodontists and general dental practitioners toward evidence-based practice and factors associated with it—A cross-sectional study

Background: Evidence-based practice is the cornerstone of dentistry and especially endodontics. Diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment with recent advancement based on evidence would be a great help for the patent satisfaction and treatment prognosis; hence, the aim of present study was to explore difference between perception, knowledge, and practice of endodontists and general dental practitioners (GDPs) towards evidence-based practice and factors associated with it. Materials and Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire study conducted among specialists in the subject of conservative and endodontic dentistry and GDPs working in private clinics in Modinagar city, Uttar Pradesh. The study was conducted in October 2019. In the present study, a close-ended questionnaire was prepared to determine the perception and practice of dental specialists. Results: The majority of endodontists (31 [35.22%]) belonged to the age group of 36–45 years of age while most of the GDPs (32 [36.36%]) belonged to 25–35 years of age group. The majority of endodontists were females (56[63.64%]) and most of the GDPs were males (50 (56.81]). More endodontists (47 [53.42]) had a positive perception of evidence-based practice than GDPs (15[16.42]). Practice toward evidence was fair among most of the endodontists (49 [55.68%]) and GDPs (54 [61.36%]). Conclusion: There was a more positive perception regarding evidence-based practice among endodontists than GDPs, knowledge was high among endodontists regarding evidence-based practice and practice was also good among endodontists. Factors associated with perception, knowledge, and practice among endodontists and GDPs were age in years, gender, year of practice, number of endodontic patients treating per month.

[1]  E. Volodina,et al.  Clinical Guidelines and Implementation into Daily Dental Practice. , 2018, Acta medica portuguesa.

[2]  M. Puranik,et al.  Knowledge, attitude, and practices toward evidence-based dentistry among dentists of Bengaluru city , 2017 .

[3]  V. Dhar Evidence-based dentistry: An overview , 2016, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[4]  Surekha Rathod,et al.  Perception of dental professionals towards evidence based dentistry , 2016 .

[5]  Simona Dianiskova,et al.  Implementation of evidence-based dentistry into practice: analysis of awareness, perceptions and attitudes of dentists in the World Dental Federation-European Regional Organization zone. , 2015, International dental journal.

[6]  M. Fabbro,et al.  Surgical versus non‐surgical endodontic re‐treatment for periradicular lesions , 2007 .

[7]  K Gulabivala,et al.  Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[8]  J. Lewsey,et al.  Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[9]  Mathew T. Kattadiyil,et al.  Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  K Gulabivala,et al.  Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[11]  A. Glenny,et al.  General dental practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes towards evidence based practice , 2002, British Dental Journal.

[12]  K. Lyons,et al.  Evidence-based practice in dentistry. , 2002, The New Zealand dental journal.

[13]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.