Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Efficient grasping requires planned and accurate coordination of finger movements to approximate the shape of an object before contact. In healthy subjects, hand shaping is known to occur early in reach under predominantly feedforward control. In patients with hemiparesis after stroke, execution of coordinated digit motion during grasping is impaired as a result of damage to the corticospinal tract. The question addressed here is whether patients with hemiparesis are able to compensate for their execution deficit with a qualitatively different grasp strategy that still allows them to differentiate hand posture to object shape. Subjects grasped a rectangular, concave, and convex object while wearing an instrumented glove. Reach-to-grasp was divided into three phases based on wrist kinematics: reach acceleration (reach onset to peak horizontal wrist velocity), reach deceleration (peak horizontal wrist velocity to reach offset), and grasp (reach offset to lift-off). Patients showed reduced finger abduction, proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion, and metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) extension at object grasp across all three shapes compared with controls; however, they were able to partially differentiate hand posture for the convex and concave shapes using a compensatory strategy that involved increased MCP flexion rather than the PIP flexion seen in controls. Interestingly, shape-specific hand postures did not unfold initially during reach acceleration as seen in controls, but instead evolved later during reach deceleration, which suggests increased reliance on sensory feedback. These results indicate that kinematic analysis can identify and quantify within-limb compensatory motor control strategies after stroke. From a clinical perspective, quantitative study of compensation is important to better understand the process of recovery from brain injury. From a motor control perspective, compensation can be considered a model for how joint redundancy is exploited to accomplish the task goal through redistribution of work across effectors.

[1]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Grip aperture scaling to object size in chronic stroke. , 2009, Motor control.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Anne O'Hare,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE MANUAL PRAXIS , 1999 .

[4]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients , 2003, Brain Research.

[5]  L. Kurlowicz,et al.  The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). , 1999, Director.

[6]  Preeti Raghavan,et al.  Patterns of impairment in digit independence after subcortical stroke. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Santello,et al.  The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Francisco J. Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Effects of neuromuscular lags on controlling contact transitions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  W. Rymer,et al.  Extrinsic flexor muscles generate concurrent flexion of all three finger joints. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Luis F. Schettino,et al.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[13]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Neural Control of Motion-to-Force Transitions with the Fingertip , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Anticipatory control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertips adapts optimally to task difficulty. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  A. O'hare,et al.  Development of an instrument to measure manual praxis , 1999, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[18]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Effects of Object Texture on Precontact Movement Time in Human Prehension. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  Marco Santello,et al.  Patterns of Hand Motion during Grasping and the Influence of Sensory Guidance , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Nudo,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Motor Training on Movement Representations in Adult Squirrel Monkeys: Role of Use versus Learning , 2000, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[21]  O. Witte,et al.  Motor improvements after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats are mediated by compensatory mechanisms , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  The reach to grasp movement of blind subjects , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M. Santello,et al.  Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  R. Hébert,et al.  The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. , 1995, Disability and rehabilitation.

[25]  M. Smyth,et al.  The Role of Sight of the Hand in the Development of Prehension in Childhood , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Barbara Sakitt Visual-motor efficiency (VME) and the information transmitted in visual-motor tasks , 1980 .

[27]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  M. Muhlenhaupt Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry , 1986 .

[30]  KM Jacobs,et al.  Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical connections , 1991, Science.

[31]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[33]  M. Tresch,et al.  The case for and against muscle synergies , 2022 .

[34]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[35]  D. Nowak,et al.  Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  H. Topka,et al.  Deficits of predictive grip force control during object manipulation in acute stroke , 2003, Journal of Neurology.

[37]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Thomas A Matyas,et al.  Grip force regulation during pinch grip lifts under somatosensory guidance: comparison between people with stroke and healthy controls. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Hand coordination following capsular stroke. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  M. Levin,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: the reaching performance scale. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[42]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Recovery of Grasp versus Reach in People with Hemiparesis Poststroke , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  Steven M. Finbeiner,et al.  The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements , 1989, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[45]  F. Zajac,et al.  Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Reaching and Grasping Strategies in Hemiparetic Patients , 1997 .

[47]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[48]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[51]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[52]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Preeti Raghavan,et al.  Impaired anticipatory control of fingertip forces in patients with a pure motor or sensorimotor lacunar syndrome. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.