Bcis That Use P 300 Event-related Potentials

27 of visual evoked potentials (i.e., VEPs) have been used as signal 28 features for BCIs. The design and operation of BCIs that use 29 endogenous ERP components differ both in principle and 30 practice from those of BCIs that use exogenous ERP compo­ 31 nents. This chapter focuses on BCIs that use P300, an endoge­ 32 nous ERP component. Chapter 14 discusses BCIs that use 33 exogenous VEP components.

[1]  Brendan Z Allison,et al.  Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance, and preference: implications for a BCI system. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Visual stimuli for the P300 brain–computer interface: A comparison of white/gray and green/blue flicker matrices , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  Adaptive active auditory brain computer interface , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support vector channel selection in BCI , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Alain Rakotomamonjy,et al.  BCI Competition III: Dataset II- Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 Speller , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  W. Pritchard.  Psychophysiology of P300. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Tao Liu,et al.  N200-speller using motion-onset visual response , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[11]  E Donchin,et al.  Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[12]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Toward enhanced P 300 speller performance , 2007 .

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[14]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[15]  E Donchin,et al.  Beyond averaging: the use of discriminant functions to recognize event related potentials elicited by single auditory stimuli. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Nessi: An EEG-Controlled Web Browser for Severely Paralyzed Patients , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  Masayuki Inoue,et al.  Long-term patterns of change in ERPs across repeated measurements , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  E Donchin,et al.  Discriminant analysis in average evoked response studies: the study of single trial data. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[21]  S M M Martens,et al.  Overlap and refractory effects in a brain–computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain potential. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[23]  C D Wickens,et al.  The dynamics of P300 during dual-task performance. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[24]  C D Wickens,et al.  Processing of stimulus properties: evidence for dual-task integrality. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[26]  E. Donchin,et al.  The mental prosthesis: Assessing the speed of a brain-computer interface , 1998 .

[27]  Eric W. Sellers,et al.  Predictive Spelling With a P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface: Increasing the Rate of Communication , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and subjective probability in a learning task , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[29]  D. Hu,et al.  Gaze independent brain–computer speller with covert visual search tasks , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Linden.  The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us? , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[31]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[32]  S. Sanei,et al.  Steady-State Movement Related Potentials for Brain–Computer Interfacing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Francisco Sepulveda,et al.  Classification effects of real and imaginary movement selective attention tasks on a P300-based brain–computer interface , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  John Polich,et al.  P300 Sequence Effects, Probability, and Interstimulus Interval , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[35]  David Gutiérrez,et al.  EEG data classification through signal spatial redistribution and optimized linear discriminants , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[36]  Thilo Hinterberger,et al.  An Auditory Brain-Computer Interface Based on the Self-Regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  T. Takeshita,et al.  P300 habituation from auditory single-stimulus and oddball paradigms. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  E Donchin,et al.  Beyond averaging. II. Single-trial classification of exogenous event-related potentials using stepwise discriminant analysis. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  A. Lenhardt,et al.  An Adaptive P300-Based Online Brain–Computer Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  Yael Arbel,et al.  Single trial independent component analysis for P300 BCI system , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[42]  N.S. Dias,et al.  Comparison of EEG Pattern Classification Methods for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  Improving Transfer Rates in Brain Computer Interfacing: A Case Study , 2002, NIPS.

[44]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  A Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[45]  Michael Bensch,et al.  Design and Implementation of a P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Controlling an Internet Browser , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  C D Wickens,et al.  An Analysis of the Processing Requirements of a Complex Perceptual-Motor Task , 1983, Human factors.

[47]  Eric W Sellers,et al.  Manipulating attention via mindfulness induction improves P300-based brain–computer interface performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[49]  G. McCarthy,et al.  On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection , 2004, NeuroImage.

[52]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  An Auditory Paradigm for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[53]  R T Knight,et al.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[54]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  An Information Theoretical Approach to Task-Switching: Evidence from Cognitive Brain Potentials in Humans , 2007, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[56]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[57]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Extraction of P300 using constrained independent component analysis , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[58]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[59]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[60]  F. Piccione,et al.  P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[61]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[62]  E W Sellers,et al.  Suppressing flashes of items surrounding targets during calibration of a P300-based brain–computer interface improves performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[63]  R. Eason.  Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention , 1981 .

[64]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[65]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  An improved P300-based brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[66]  Tomohiko Igasaki,et al.  Communication aid device utilizing event-related potentials for patients with severe motor impairment , 2007, Brain Research.

[67]  G. Mangun.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[68]  E Callaway,et al.  Auditory evoked potential variability in schizophrenia. II. The application of discriminant analysis. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[69]  D.J. McFarland,et al.  The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[70]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces--the key for the conscious brain locked into a paralyzed body. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[71]  Robert T Knight,et al.  An information-theoretical approach to contextual processing in the human brain: evidence from prefrontal lesions. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[72]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Does the ‘P300’ speller depend on eye gaze? , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[73]  J. Polich,et al.  Normal variation of P300 from auditory stimuli. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[74]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[75]  D. McFarland,et al.  An auditory brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[76]  A. S. Rodionov,et al.  Comparison of linear, nonlinear and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification , 2004, International Conference on Actual Problems of Electron Devices Engineering, 2004. APEDE 2004..

[77]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[78]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[79]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use , 2010, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[80]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural origins of the P300. , 2000, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[81]  J. Polich,et al.  Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[82]  B. Fowler.  P300 as a Measure of Workload during a Simulated Aircraft Landing Task , 1994, Human factors.

[83]  B. Blankertz,et al.  (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[84]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching , 2010, Cortex.

[85]  J. Polich,et al.  On P300 measurement stability: habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[86]  B. Blankertz,et al.  A New Auditory Multi-Class Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm: Spatial Hearing as an Informative Cue , 2010, PloS one.

[87]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Optimized stimulus presentation patterns for an event-related potential EEG-based brain–computer interface , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[88]  R. Knight,et al.  Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3 , 1989, Brain Research.

[89]  F. Sepulveda,et al.  Robustness of the Farwell & Donchin BCI protocol to visual stimulus parameter changes , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[90]  C D Wickens,et al.  The Event‐Related Potential as an Index of the Processing Demands of a Complex Target Acquisition Task a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[91]  J. Mouriño,et al.  Recognition of imagined hand movements with low resolution surface Laplacian and linear classifiers. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[92]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Control of an Internet Browser Using the P300 Event- Related Potential , 2008 .

[93]  L. R. Quitadamo,et al.  Which Physiological Components are More Suitable for Visual ERP Based Brain–Computer Interface? A Preliminary MEG/EEG Study , 2010, Brain Topography.

[94]  E Donchin,et al.  The P300 as a metric for mental workload. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[95]  Roy Stripling,et al.  Neural mechanisms for learning actions in context , 2007, Brain Research.

[96]  B.Z. Allison,et al.  ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[97]  Clodoaldo Ap. M. Lima,et al.  Tackling EEG signal classification with least squares support vector machines: A sensitivity analysis study , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[98]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[99]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  A P 300-based brain – computer interface : Initial tests by ALS patients Eric , 2006 .

[100]  J.J. Vidal,et al.  Real-time detection of brain events in EEG , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[101]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[102]  J. R. Wolpaw,et al.  ' s personal copy A novel P 300-based brain – computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm : Moving beyond rows and columns q , 2010 .

[103]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[104]  A Kübler,et al.  A P 300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2010 .

[105]  C. Cinel,et al.  P300-Based BCI Mouse With Genetically-Optimized Analogue Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[106]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 Habituation Patterns: Individual Differences from Ultradian Rhythms , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[107]  J. Si,et al.  Closed-loop cortical control of direction using support vector machines , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[108]  M. Thulasidas,et al.  Robust classification of EEG signal for brain-computer interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[109]  Wei Sun,et al.  A Semisupervised Support Vector Machines Algorithm for BCI Systems , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[110]  J. Polich,et al.  P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[111]  E R John,et al.  Information Delivery and the Sensory Evoked Potential , 1967, Science.

[112]  M Salvaris,et al.  Visual modifications on the P300 speller BCI paradigm , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[113]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  An Auditory Brain–Computer Interface Using Active Mental Response , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.