Perceived family health in persons with prostate cancer and their family members.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To describe perceived family health in persons with prostate cancer and their family members. An additional purpose was to describe the associations between the background variables of persons with prostate cancer and their family members and perceived family health. BACKGROUND Prostate cancer in one family member affects the health of the whole family. It is important to study perceived family health in families of persons with prostate cancer and associated factors. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. METHOD Data were collected using the Family Functioning, Health and Social Support (FAFHES) scale, modified for use in this study. Questionnaires were distributed to 100 persons with prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiation therapy and 100 family members at one Finnish university hospital in April-October 2009. Responses were received from 76 persons and 71 family members, a response rate of 74%. RESULTS Persons with prostate cancer and family members rated family health good despite prostate cancer. Family members reported higher levels of illness-related ill-being than persons with prostate cancer. Family health was associated with the person's age, basic education, employment status, number of family member's visits to the hospitalised patient, first symptom of prostate cancer and previous hospitalisations were associated with. Family health was associated with the family member's basic and vocational education. CONCLUSIONS The results show that nursing care should pay attention to family members of persons with prostate cancer and that support to them should be a natural part of a good care of persons with prostate cancer. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The quality of prostate cancer care should be improved to provide more individualised and family-focussed services.

[1]  P. Åstedt‐Kurki,et al.  Further testing of a family nursing instrument (FAFHES). , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[2]  John T. Wei,et al.  Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Bloch,et al.  Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature , 2006, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  L. Northouse,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Couples' Experience With Prostate Cancer by Age Cohort , 2006, Cancer nursing.

[5]  F. Saad,et al.  Adaptation of wives to prostate cancer following diagnosis and 3 months after treatment: a test of family adaptation theory. , 2006, International journal of nursing studies.

[6]  P. Åstedt‐Kurki,et al.  Family Functioning Assessed by Family Members in Finnish Families of Heart Patients , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  R. McCorkle,et al.  Spousal Responses to Prostate Cancer: An Integrative Review , 2006, Cancer investigation.

[8]  P. Åstedt‐Kurki,et al.  Determinants of perceived health in families of patients with heart disease. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Psychoeducational group intervention for wives of men with prostate cancer , 2004, Psycho-oncology.

[10]  P. Åstedt‐Kurki,et al.  In-hospital social support for families of heart patients. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[11]  Ruth McCorkle,et al.  From “Death Sentence” to “Good Cancer”: Couples’ Transformation of a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis , 2002, Nursing research.

[12]  P. Åstedt‐Kurki,et al.  Development and Testing of a Family Nursing Scale , 2002, Western journal of nursing research.

[13]  C. Rees,et al.  Information Needs and Information-seeking Behaviors of Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners: A Review of the Literature , 2002, Cancer nursing.

[14]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Bowel, urinary, and sexual problems among long-term prostate cancer survivors: a population-based study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.