The impact of evoked consumption contexts and appropriateness on emotion responses

Sensory and consumer scientists are seeing the need to explore broader measures, such as product-driven emotions, to be able to fully understand and satisfy consumers’ demands. However, to date, the consumer methodologies used in food-related emotion research have neglected a crucial element linked to emotions: the consumption context. This is a concern, because consumers’ emotional responses to food are elicited by many other sources apart from the sensory properties of the food itself. The present research aimed to fill in this gap of knowledge by exploring how evoked consumption contexts affect responses obtained from an emotion questionnaire. Two food stimuli (apple and chocolate brownie) and three different consumption contexts (a ‘weekend breakfast’, an ‘afternoon snack’, and ‘after a special dinner’) were used to vary the level of product-context appropriateness. A within-subject design was used in which 157 participants first completed an emotion questionnaire (36 terms, checklist format) in response to each of the evoked consumption contexts (presented in written format). A week later, the same participants completed the same emotion questionnaire while imagining themselves eating an apple or chocolate brownie (shown as images) without any given context (control condition), and then under the three different contexts (random monadic sequential order). When the chocolate brownie was the food stimulus, 20 of 36 emotion responses were significantly different from context to context (including the no-context condition). Conversely, only 9 significant differences were established when apple was the food stimulus. It was also found that frequency of use of positive emotion terms was higher in those consumption contexts that were considered more appropriate, whereas negative emotion terms were more frequently selected when the context was perceived as less appropriate for the product. Taken together, these findings highlight how the context in which a food is consumed (even if imagined) can affect consumers’ emotion responses towards it. More broadly, they demonstrate the reciprocal effect that the context and the product have on the elicited emotion responses, which are not situationally invariant. This research also explored how psychological traits related to emotional eating affected the emotion responses and found that in general higher emotional eaters selected a higher number of emotion terms (positive and negative). This study represents a needed advance in food-related emotion research, and upon replication of the results with other product-context combinations, could offer an easy-to-implement methodology that should more closely match the emotion responses that consumers would elicit in real-life situations while eating and drinking.

[1]  D. Thomson,et al.  Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate , 2010 .

[2]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[3]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Measuring emotions associated with foods: Important elements of questionnaire and test design , 2013 .

[4]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MULTILINGUAL LABELED SORTING TASKS: APPLICATION TO A CROSS‐CULTURAL STUDY IN WINE INDUSTRY , 2011 .

[5]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings , 2010 .

[6]  Marsha L. Richins Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience , 1997 .

[7]  Tatjana van Strien,et al.  The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior , 1986 .

[8]  Emotional response to fruit salads with different visual quality , 2013 .

[9]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  Hedonic asymmetry in emotional responses to consumer products , 2010 .

[10]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study , 2007 .

[11]  C. Devine,et al.  Dimensions of everyday eating and drinking episodes , 2007, Appetite.

[12]  D. Thomson,et al.  A data-driven classification of feelings , 2013 .

[13]  Rick Bell,et al.  Effects of Adding an Italian Theme to a Restaurant on the Perceived Ethnicity, Acceptability, and Selection of Foods , 1994, Appetite.

[14]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  Sensory benefits, emotions and usage patterns for olives: using Internet-based conjoint analysis and segmentation to understand patterns of response , 2005 .

[15]  A. Cardello,et al.  Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires , 2012 .

[16]  C. Nederkoorn,et al.  The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The validity of the DEBQ External Eating Scale and the critical role of depression , 2010, Appetite.

[17]  F. M. Kramer,et al.  A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: the role of choice , 2005, Appetite.

[18]  H. Meiselman,et al.  The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods , 2003 .

[19]  P. Desmet,et al.  Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience , 2008, Appetite.

[20]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Impact of individual differences in emotional intensity and private body consciousness on EsSense Profile® responses , 2013 .

[21]  N. Stroebele,et al.  Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. , 2004, Nutrition.

[22]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Rating of products through scores and free-text assertions: Comparing and combining both , 2008 .

[23]  H. Schutz Appropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance , 1994 .

[24]  C. Petit,et al.  Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence? , 2007 .

[25]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods , 2010 .

[26]  P. Desmet,et al.  Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience , 2013 .

[27]  E. Köster The psychology of food choice: some often encountered fallacies , 2003 .

[28]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation , 1996 .

[29]  David M. Levine,et al.  Statistics for Managers , 2008 .

[30]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[31]  H. Meiselman,et al.  Measuring emotions associated with foods in consumer testing. , 2010 .

[32]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Emotion questionnaires: A consumer-centric perspective , 2013 .

[33]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages , 2012 .