A new dimensional measure of antisocial behaviour evaluation (ASBE)

ABSTRACT Adolescent thinking about the wrongness of antisocial behaviours plays a key role in their own engagement in antisocial conducts. Nevertheless, measures assessing adolescent antisocial evaluations are not common in literature. Informed by the social domain theory and using adolescent actual thinking about antisocial behaviours, this study developed and validated a new dimensional scale of antisocial behaviour evaluation (ASBE) with two sub-samples of Italian adolescents (Total N = 678; M age = 15.48, SD = 1.61; 291 males). Applying the exploratory factor analysis within the confirmatory factor analysis framework (abbreviated, E/CFA), we found four correlated dimensions of ASBE: The impersonal dimension, including violations carried out against social and legal norms, without any direct contact with other people; the interpersonal dimension, reflecting violations that imply harming other persons; the personal-risky dimension, containing items that refer to violations whose consequences primarily affect one’s own safety and health; the loyalty dimension, representing violations that concern reciprocity and loyalty among peers and friends. The scale showed a good internal consistency and validity. The results support a promising use of this new measure for assessing adolescent antisocial thinking and investigating its associations with social cognition, moral reasoning and behaviour.

[1]  John C. Gibbs Moral Development and Reality , 2019 .

[2]  D. Bacchini,et al.  Three‐year cross‐lagged relationships among adolescents’ antisocial behavior, personal values, and judgment of wrongness , 2018 .

[3]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Effortful control, exposure to community violence, and aggressive behavior: Exploring cross‐lagged relations in adolescence , 2017, Aggressive behavior.

[4]  D. Brugman,et al.  The Structure of Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions , 2016 .

[5]  D. Bacchini,et al.  Multiple Forms and Settings of Exposure to Violence and Values , 2015, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[6]  R. Fearon,et al.  Antisocial thinking in adolescents: further psychometric development of the Antisocial Beliefs and Attitudes Scale (ABAS). , 2015, Psychological assessment.

[7]  D. Bacchini,et al.  Moral vs. non-moral attribution in adolescence: Environmental and behavioural correlates , 2013 .

[8]  L. Takahashi,et al.  Toward a conceptual model linking community violence exposure to HIV-related risk behaviors among adolescents: directions for research. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[9]  M. Donnellan,et al.  Development and validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire. , 2009, Aggressive behavior.

[10]  P. Fearon,et al.  Antisocial Beliefs and Attitudes in Pre-adolescent and Adolescent Youth: the Development of the Antisocial Beliefs and Attitudes Scales (ABAS) , 2007 .

[11]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years , 2002, Development and Psychopathology.

[12]  E. Turiel,et al.  Children's Conceptions of Moral and Prudential Rules , 1984 .

[13]  G. Caprara,et al.  A New Scale for Measuring Adults' Prosocialness , 2005 .

[14]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[15]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. Loeber,et al.  Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A meta-analytic review of factor analyses and cross-validation in a clinic sample , 1993 .