Nonverbal Interpersonal Interactions in Clinical Encounters and Patient Perceptions of Empathy

and Introduction Abstract Objective: The relationship between nonverbal behaviors and patient perceptions of clinicians has been underexplored. The aim of this study was to understand the relationship between nonverbal communication behaviors (eye contact and social touch) to patient assessments of clinician (empathy, connectedness, and liking). Methods: Hypotheses were tested including clinician and patient nonverbal behaviors (eye contact, social touch) were coded temporally in 110 videotaped clinical encounters. Patient participants completed questionnaires to measure their perception of clinician empathy, connectedness with clinician, and how much they liked their clinician, Results: Length of visit and eye contact between clinician and patient were positively related to the patient's assessment of the clinician's empathy. Eye contact was significantly related to patient perceptions of clinician attributes, such as connectedness and liking. Conclusion: Eye contact and social touch were significantly related to patient perceptions of clinician empathy. Future research in this area is warranted, particular with regards to health information technology and clinical system design. Practice Implications: Clinical environments designed for patient and clinician interaction should be designed to facilitate positive nonverbal interactions such as eye contact and social touch. Specifically, health information technology should not restrict clinicians' ability to make eye contact with their patients. Introduction The clinician-patient relationship has evolved from an autocratic relationship to a partnership between patient and clinician.[1–4] Training in teamwork might promote strategies for positive communication, such as adaptation to stress, group decision making, and coordinated task performance.[5] Communication plays an important role in each phase of teamwork; therefore, factors that affect clinician-patient communication and teamwork should be investigated in depth.[6] Clinician-Patient Relationships The relationship between clinician and patient in the clinical encounter is a fundamental aspect of the health care system.[7] Previous studies have indicated that there is a lack of high-quality research and evaluation regarding consultation dynamics.[8– 10] One metric of assessing the quality of the clinician-patient relationship is patient satisfaction.[11] Patient satisfaction is related to the clinician-patient relationship,[12] the quality of health care,[13] and adherence to medical treatment.[14] While many dimensions may contribute to patient satisfaction such as waiting time, hospital location, care delivery, and communication skills,[15 16] the quality of communication with clinicians can influence patient perceptions of their clinicians and the quality of care they are receiving. One report has suggested that 85% of patients changed or were considering changing their physician due to poor communication skills.[17] Empathy, as it applies to clinicians, is defined as the socio-emotional competence of a physician to be able to understand the patient's situation (perspective, beliefs, and experiences), to communicate that understanding and check its accuracy, and to act on that understanding with the patient in a therapeutic way.[9 18 19] Empathy may be a core component of the medical relationship and has been linked to other important interpersonal interaction variables such as patient trust and satisfaction.[7] Health systems researchers have made connections between empathy and other outcomes, such as enhanced adherence, patient satisfaction, patient enablement, and information exchange.[20–4] Studies have illustrated the importance of these outcomes to patient assessments of their clinician's empathy.[24] Developing empathy is key to building a solid base for the clinician-patient relationship. Empathy has been investigated in clinical encounters,[25–27] but there is very little evidence that links empathy, satisfaction, and nonverbal behavior to health encounter outcomes. Investigating these linkages is important since such social processes and outcomes may relate to the effectiveness of clinical encounters regarding behavior changes. For example, emotional rapport may influence the effectiveness of behavior change counseling for overweight and obese patients.[28] The study described in this manuscript explores nonverbal interactions in the clinical encounter in relation to patient perceptions of the clinician's empathy. Nonverbal Interpersonal Interactions in Clinical Encounters and Patient Perceptions of Empathy 7/6/2017 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/810476_print http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/810476_print 2/17 Nonverbal Behavior in Clinician-patient Interaction Nonverbal communication is defined as the aspect of communication that information is exchanged through nonverbal cues which are not purely linguistic in content,[29] such as gesture, touch, posture, facial expression, eye contact, clothing and hairstyle.[30] Investigating the clinician-patient relationship, there were significant amount of research focused on verbal communication between clinician and patient.[31 32] On the contrary, nonverbal behavior among clinician-patient relationship has been less studied.[30] Many studies focus on how the clinician's nonverbal behavior affects the patient's perspective, such as patient satisfaction.[6] However, there is a growing awareness of the value of nonverbal communication; more and more studies have focused on quantitatively evaluating nonverbal behavior. Coding systems for nonverbal interaction have been developed, such as Nonverbal Communication in Doctor-Elderly Patient Transactions (NDEPT),[33] Nonverbal Accommodation Analysis System (NAAS),[34] Relational Communication Scale for Observational Measurement (RCS-O),[35] and some instruments used in studies of the effects of physician gender on nonverbal behavior.[36] Developing validated methods and reliable analysis tools are still needed to evaluate nonverbal communication in clinician-patient relationship.[37] Eye gaze is a particular point of interest in nonverbal cues related to understanding trust, empathy, and rapport. The role of directed gaze in clinician-patient interaction has been explored in previous studies. In one study 34 patient-physician visits at a family medical center were videotaped; after the session all patients completed a survey about their satisfaction with the clinician. Each tape was reviewed at 40-second intervals and coded for nonverbal behaviors. The results suggested that the clinician's gazing at the patient was not significantly related to the patient's satisfaction.[38] In addition, studies have explored eye contact with computers in clinical encounters. Margalit and colleagues[39] found that computers affected communication patterns between patients and clinicians, and they recommended using caution regarding the implementation of technologies in clinical encounters. In another study, Harrigan and colleagues[40] conducted an empirical study of 36 videotaped family medicine residents' interviews with patients. Nonverbal behavior was coded using a coding system, and each video was rated for rapport and connection between clinician and patient. Eye contact between the clinician and the patient significantly related to patient ratings of rapport and satisfaction. Touch is another nonverbal interaction that is important for the development of empathy. For example, clinicians sometimes touch their patients to express caring and empathy.[41] Generally, there are two different types (see Table 1) of touch in the consultation: physical touch and therapeutic touch.[42] Others have described these types of touch as diagnostic touch and healing touch.][43] Although they have different names, the action and purpose of the touch are the same. In this study, task touch and social touch are used to distinguish the two forms of touch. Task touch is touch that has a clinical purpose, such as a clinician's touch during an examination, and social touch has specific social meaning, such as a handshake.

[1]  P. Barnes,et al.  Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. , 2004, Advance data.

[2]  M. Wirtz,et al.  Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Physician Gender Affects How Physician Nonverbal Behavior Is Related to Patient Satisfaction , 2008, Medical care.

[4]  R. Epstein,et al.  Soliciting the Patient's Agenda , 2005 .

[5]  Partnership in care: a critical review. , 1995, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[6]  Edsel A. Peña,et al.  Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions , 2006, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[8]  S. Mercer,et al.  Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland , 2007, BMC family practice.

[9]  David Heaney,et al.  The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. , 2004, Family practice.

[10]  John R Clark Physician-patient relationships. , 2011, Air medical journal.

[11]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Rapport expressed through nonverbal behavior , 1985 .

[12]  Michael Bury,et al.  The Sociology of the Health Service , 1991 .

[13]  William Ickes,et al.  Naturalistic Social Cognition: Empathic Accuracy in Mixed-Sex Dyads , 1990 .

[14]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Patient and physician attitudes in the health care context: Attitudinal symmetry predicts patient satisfaction and adherence , 2007, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  A. Finset,et al.  Nonverbal Communication in Clinical Contexts , 2011 .

[16]  G. Freeman,et al.  Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context , 2002, British medical journal.

[17]  R. Pedersen Empathy development in medical education – A critical review , 2010, Medical teacher.

[18]  M. Hook,et al.  Partnering with patients--a concept ready for action. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  B. Chewning,et al.  Practitioner empathy and the duration of the common cold. , 2009, Family medicine.

[20]  Andy J. King,et al.  Patient-provider communication and low-income adults: age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  J. Bruhn,et al.  The Doctor's Touch: Tactile Communication in the Doctor-Patient Relationship , 1978, Southern medical journal.

[22]  Usha Sambamoorthi,et al.  Type of Multimorbidity and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Adults , 2015, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[23]  G. Watt,et al.  Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. , 2005, Family practice.

[24]  Stanford W Gregory,et al.  Further analysis of a doctor-patient nonverbal communication instrument. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Patient satisfaction with access in two interprofessional academic family medicine clinics. , 2009, Family practice.

[26]  Wendy Levinson,et al.  Physician Frustration in Communicating with Patients , 1993, Medical care.

[27]  F. Carnevale,et al.  Partnership: an analysis of the concept within the nurse-client relationship. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[28]  S. Mercer,et al.  A qualitative study of patient's views on the consultation at the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital, an NHS integrative complementary and orthodox medical care unit. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[29]  D. Jatulis,et al.  Satisfaction with access to and quality of health care among Medicare enrollees in a health maintenance organization. , 1997, The Western journal of medicine.

[30]  S. Mercer,et al.  A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. , 2005, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[31]  T. Coleman Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. , 2000, Family practice.

[32]  M. S. Mast On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  D. Roter,et al.  Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[34]  M. Shattell,et al.  'Take my hand, help me out': mental health service recipients' experience of the therapeutic relationship. , 2007, International journal of mental health nursing.

[35]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior in clinician—patient interaction , 1995 .

[36]  M. A. Carter,et al.  Trust, power, and vulnerability: a discourse on helping in nursing. , 2009, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[37]  Sandra S. Smith-Hanen Effects of Nonverbal Behaviors on Judged Levels of Counselor Warmth and Empathy. , 1977 .

[38]  K M Larsen,et al.  Assessment of nonverbal communication in the patient-physician interview. , 1981, The Journal of family practice.

[39]  Rita Gorawara-Bhat,et al.  Nonverbal communication in doctor-elderly patient transactions (NDEPT): development of a tool. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[40]  C. Bylund,et al.  The Nonverbal Accommodation Analysis System (NAAS): initial application and evaluation. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[41]  Jie Xu,et al.  Modeling Eye Gaze Patterns in Clinician–Patient Interaction With Lag Sequential Analysis , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[42]  R. Frankel,et al.  The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[43]  G. Watt,et al.  The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[44]  D. Roter,et al.  Physicians build less rapport with obese patients , 2013, Obesity.

[45]  Kerry Bone,et al.  Rationale and methods for a trial assessing placebo, echinacea, and doctor-patient interaction in the common cold. , 2007, Explore.

[46]  S. O. Chang,et al.  The conceptual structure of physical touch in caring. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[47]  Tessa V. West,et al.  Behavioral observation and coding , 2014 .

[48]  J. Sitzia,et al.  Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[49]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[50]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Computer Supported Cooperative Work: New challenges to systems design , 1999 .

[51]  M. Wirtz,et al.  General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[52]  A. Finset,et al.  Nonverbal communication--An important key to in-depth understanding of provider-patient interaction. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[53]  北村 聖 "The New England Journal of Medicine". , 1962, British medical journal.

[54]  D. Farrington,et al.  Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. , 2006, Journal of adolescence.

[55]  Jasook Koo,et al.  Physical therapists' nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients' health outcomes. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[56]  N. Cousins How patients appraise physicians. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[57]  James G. Emshoff,et al.  Touch in psychotherapy: A survey of patients' experiences. , 1995 .

[58]  Mark L. Knapp,et al.  1 Welcome to the Handbook of Nonverbal Communication , 2013 .

[59]  M O Roland,et al.  Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.