A multilevel explanation of end-user computing satisfaction with an enterprise resource planning system within an international manufacturing organization

The present research results assume that end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS) of an enterprise resource planning system (ERP system) depends on users' positive perception of determinants on multiple organizational levels. Hence, rather than investigating a precise theory of narrow focus, this research addresses the users' view of the impact of major project and organizational issues on EUCS. This requires a multilevel approach to research. A hierarchical regression analysis based on data from 123 middle managers and super-users from a single company with operating units in 10 western European countries confirmed this theory. Still, a path analysis suggests that determinants representing the near user environment (communication and decision-making patterns between users and experts locally during the ERP system implementation process, and communication with peers in organizational units other than that of the respondent) contribute more consistently to EUCS than determinants on other organizational levels. User training plays a role in helping users understand the relevance of ERP system project business objectives, but training does not help in explaining EUCS. The study points to future research in the areas of instrument development as well as an increased understanding of stakeholders' views, determinant definitions, relationships among determinants, and measures of ERP system outcome.

[1]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[2]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  Understanding user participation and involvement in ERP use , 2000 .

[3]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[4]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Information Systems Design Decisions in a Global Versus Domestic Context , 1995, MIS Q..

[5]  Raquel Sanz-Valle,et al.  Effects of training on business results1 , 2003 .

[6]  Subhasish Dasgupta,et al.  Modeling use of enterprise resource planning systems: a path analytic study , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Rethinking ERP success: A new perspective from knowledge management and continuous improvement , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  The Organizational Context , 1990 .

[10]  Bernard Grabot,et al.  A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[11]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  Erp Implementation Failure: A Case Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  M. Bradford,et al.  Does your ERP system measure up? , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  The Cognitive Movement in Instruction , 1979 .

[14]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  David Gefen,et al.  Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[17]  G. Latham The motivational benefits of goal-setting , 2004 .

[18]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[19]  Steven L. Alter Architecture of Sysperanto: A Model-Based Ontology of the IS Field , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Georg Herzwurm,et al.  Technology diffusion in software development processes: the contribution of organizational learning to software process improvement , 1998 .

[21]  Roger W. Harris Schools of Thought in Research into End-User Computing Success , 2000, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[22]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning , 2002 .

[25]  William J. Doll,et al.  The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues , 1991 .

[26]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: Replication within an ERP Domain , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[27]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Integrating ERP using EAI: a model for post hoc evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[29]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration , 2005 .

[30]  R. Ryan Nelson,et al.  Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-User Personnel: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements , 1991, MIS Q..

[31]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[32]  M. Peters,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN SUPPORTING THE EXTENDED SUPPLY CHAIN , 2001 .

[33]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: A Replication , 1997 .

[34]  Andy Neely,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: analysing the impact , 2001 .

[35]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Information systems innovation: a framework for research and practice , 1998 .

[37]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[38]  Jaideep Motwani,et al.  Critical factors for successful ERP implementation: Exploratory findings from four case studies , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[39]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Valérie Botta-Genoulaz,et al.  A recent survey on the research literature on ERP systems , 2005 .

[41]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  The package alternative in system replacement: evidence for innovation convergence , 1998 .

[42]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Information systems innovation and diffusion: issues and directions , 1998 .

[43]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[44]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Special Section: Enterprise Resource Planning , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Middle Managers' Contribution to Implemented Information Technology Innovation , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[47]  Robert M. Fulmer,et al.  Developing leaders with 2020 vision: companies can develop deep, enduring bench strength by combining succession planning and leadership development to create a long-term process for managing the talent roster , 2004 .

[48]  C. Argyris Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[49]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[50]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  K. Maxwell EXECUTIVE STUDY ASSESSES CURRENT STATE OF ERP IN PAPER INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[54]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[55]  R. Kanter The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work , 1985 .

[56]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[57]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  ERP systems adoption: An exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Do Cultural Differences Make a Business Difference , 1994 .

[59]  John Berridge,et al.  Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies for Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[60]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[61]  Dorien James,et al.  A second wind for ERP , 2000 .

[62]  Marianne Bradford,et al.  Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[63]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  An exploratory field study of differences in information technology use between more- and less-innovative middle managers , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[64]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1997, MIS Q..

[65]  Lisa Adent Hoecklin Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies For Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[66]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross‐functionality , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[67]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Research Report - The Importance of Specification in Causal Modeling: The Case of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: ERP SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[69]  Zoonky Lee,et al.  The management of cross-functional inter-dependencies in ERP implementations: emergent coordination patterns , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Successful implementation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case studies , 2002 .

[71]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Aligning Software Processes with Strategy , 2006, MIS Q..

[72]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[73]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[74]  Andrew Martin,et al.  A model of information systems development project performance , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[75]  Thomas F. Gattiker,et al.  Understanding the local-level costs and benefits of ERP through organizational information processing theory , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[76]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  On end-user computing satisfaction , 1991 .

[77]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[78]  Moez Limayem,et al.  The role of modelling in achieving information systems success: UML to the rescue? , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[79]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[80]  Kenneth N. McKay,et al.  The evolution of a production planning system: A 10-year case study , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[81]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[82]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  L. Davis Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement , 1992 .

[84]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[85]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  A cross-cultural analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A multi-group invariance analysis , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[86]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[87]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[88]  T. Shuell Cognitive Conceptions of Learning , 1986 .

[89]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[90]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[91]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and online news , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[92]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors , 1994, MIS Q..

[93]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts , 2001, DATB.

[94]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Study of Computer System Learning: Comparison of Co-Discovery and Self-Discovery Methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[95]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[96]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Interpreting an ERP implementation from a stakeholder perspective , 2005 .

[97]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[98]  Ike C. Ehie,et al.  Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[99]  G. Latham,et al.  Goal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different Yet Related Literatures , 2004 .

[100]  Shih-Wen Chien,et al.  Investigating the success of ERP systems: Case studies in three Taiwanese high-tech industries , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[101]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 1996, MIS Q..