Surrogate docking: structure-based virtual screening at high throughput speed
暂无分享,去创建一个
Andrew Smellie | Sukjoon Yoon | David Hartsough | Anton V. Filikov | D. Hartsough | Sukjoon Yoon | A. Smellie | A. Filikov
[1] A. Ghose,et al. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three‐Dimensional Structure‐Directed Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity , 1986 .
[2] I D Kuntz,et al. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.
[3] P. Schultz,et al. Synthesis and application of functionally diverse 2,6,9-trisubstituted purine libraries as CDK inhibitors. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.
[4] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Virtual screening methods that complement HTS. , 2004, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[5] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Nuclear hormone receptor targeted virtual screening. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DREAM++: Flexible docking program for virtual combinatorial libraries , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[7] Thomas Bäck,et al. Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice - evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms , 1996 .
[8] Igor Aleksander,et al. Introduction to Neural Computing , 1990 .
[9] Christian Lemmen,et al. Coupling structure-based design with combinatorial chemistry: application of active site derived pharmacophores with informative library design. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[10] Thierry Langer,et al. Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Inhibitors: Generation and Comparison of Structure-Based and Common Feature Pharmacophore Hypotheses and Their Application in Virtual Screening , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[11] H.‐D. Höltje,et al. Molekular Orbital Berechnungen zur Struktur des Muscarin‐Pharmakophors , 1974 .
[12] Didier Rognan,et al. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy , 2004, Proteins.
[13] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[14] H Fang,et al. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[15] A. Ghose,et al. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure‐activity relationships III: Modeling hydrophobic interactions , 1988 .
[16] Dimitris K. Agrafiotis,et al. Nearest Neighbor Search in General Metric Spaces Using a Tree Data Structure with a Simple Heuristic , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[17] Brian Hudson,et al. Strategic Pooling of Compounds for High-Throughput Screening , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[18] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Tad Hurst,et al. Flexible 3D searching: The directed tweak technique , 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[20] Heikki Mannila,et al. Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.
[21] Malin M. Young,et al. Design, docking, and evaluation of multiple libraries against multiple targets , 2001, Proteins.
[22] Haruki Nakamura,et al. A hybrid method of molecular dynamics and harmonic dynamics for docking of flexible ligand to flexible receptor , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[23] T. Bayes. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .
[24] Andrew Smellie,et al. Analysis of Conformational Coverage, 1. Validation and Estimation of Coverage , 1995, Journal of chemical information and computer sciences.
[25] I D Kuntz,et al. CombiDOCK: Structure-based combinatorial docking and library design , 1998, Journal of computer-aided molecular design.
[26] Q Xie,et al. Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens. , 2001, Chemical research in toxicology.
[27] Trevor Heritage,et al. OptiDock: virtual HTS of combinatorial libraries by efficient sampling of binding modes in product space. , 2004, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.
[28] Leo Breiman,et al. Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .
[29] P.-C.-F. Daunou,et al. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin , 1803 .
[30] Christopher M. Bishop,et al. Classification and regression , 1997 .
[31] Meir Glick,et al. Application of Machine Learning To Improve the Results of High-Throughput Docking Against the HIV-1 Protease , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[32] P. Charifson,et al. Improved scoring of ligand-protein interactions using OWFEG free energy grids. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[33] Andreas Bender,et al. Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[34] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[35] Darko Butina,et al. Unsupervised Data Base Clustering Based on Daylight's Fingerprint and Tanimoto Similarity: A Fast and Automated Way To Cluster Small and Large Data Sets , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[36] Henrik Boström,et al. Improving structure-based virtual screening by multivariate analysis of scoring data. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.