Artificial Intelligence Estimates the Importance of Baseline Factors in Predicting Response to Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Melanoma

Objective: Prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has dramatically improved over recent years because of the advent of antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1). However, the response rate is ~40% and baseline biomarkers for the outcome are yet to be identified. Here, we aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence might be useful in weighting the importance of baseline variables in predicting response to anti-PD1. Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating 173 patients receiving anti-PD1 for melanoma. Using an artificial neuronal network analysis, the importance of different variables was estimated and used in predicting response rate and overall survival. Results: After a mean follow-up of 12.8 (±11.9) months, disease control rate was 51%. Using artificial neuronal network, we observed that 3 factors predicted response to anti-PD1: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (importance: 0.195), presence of ≥3 metastatic sites (importance: 0.156), and baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (importance: 0.154). Looking at connections between different covariates and overall survival, the most important variables influencing survival were: presence of ≥3 metastatic sites (importance: 0.202), age (importance: 0.189), NLR (importance: 0.164), site of primary melanoma (cutaneous vs. noncutaneous) (importance: 0.112), and LDH > upper limit of normal (importance: 0.108). Conclusions: NLR, presence of ≥3 metastatic sites, LDH levels, age, and site of primary melanoma are important baseline factors influencing response and survival. Further studies are warranted to estimate a model to drive the choice to administered anti-PD1 treatments in patients with melanoma.

[1]  H. Maillard,et al.  High neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio before starting anti‐programmed cell death 1 immunotherapy predicts poor outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma , 2018, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  D. B. Sacdalan,et al.  Prognostic utility of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review and meta-analysis , 2018, OncoTargets and therapy.

[3]  S. Markovic,et al.  Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is associated with survival in pembrolizumab-treated metastatic melanoma patients , 2017, Melanoma research.

[4]  R. Carvajal,et al.  Mucosal Melanoma: New Insights and Therapeutic Options for a Unique and Aggressive Disease. , 2017, Oncology.

[5]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  M. Wiese,et al.  Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors using routinely available blood and clinical markers , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  F. Goldwasser,et al.  Clinical parameters associated with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors-induced tumor response in melanoma patients , 2017, Investigational New Drugs.

[8]  A. Giobbie-Hurder,et al.  Efficacy of PD-1 & PD-L1 inhibitors in older adults: a meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[9]  R. Carvajal,et al.  Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma: Current Status and Emerging Therapies , 2017, Current Oncology Reports.

[10]  M. Amagai,et al.  Nivolumab for advanced melanoma: pretreatment prognostic factors and early outcome markers during therapy , 2016, Oncotarget.

[11]  S. Gandini,et al.  Prognostic significance of hematological profiles in melanoma patients , 2016, International journal of cancer.

[12]  R. Dummer,et al.  Derivation and validation of a prediction scale for response to PD-1 monotherapy. , 2016 .

[13]  C. Berking,et al.  Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Baseline neutrophils and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: prognostic relevance in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  C. Horak,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With BRAF V600 Mutant and BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Clinical Trials. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[17]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Mordechai Rosner,et al.  Forecasting the prognosis of choroidal melanoma with an artificial neural network. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[21]  B. Damato,et al.  Modelling survival after treatment of intraocular melanoma using artificial neural networks and Bayes theorem. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Renato Marchesini,et al.  Automated melanoma detection: multispectral imaging and neural network approach for classification. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  P. Barbini,et al.  Digital dermoscopy analysis and artificial neural network for the differentiation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions: a retrospective study. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[24]  Martin F. Mihm,et al.  Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  C. Lombardo,et al.  Artificial intelligence estimates the impact of human papillomavirus types in influencing the risk of cervical dysplasia recurrence: progress toward a more personalized approach , 2019, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[26]  B. Dréno,et al.  Blood Predictive Biomarkers for Nivolumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2018, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[27]  L. Thomas,et al.  Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma , 2018, JAMA dermatology.