Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed

It is typically assumed that basic features of human gait are determined by purely biomechanical factors. In two experiments, we test whether gait transition speed and preferred walking speed are also influenced by visual information about the speed of self-motion. The visual flow during treadmill locomotion was manipulated to be slower than, matched to, or faster than the physical gait speed (visual gains of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0). Higher flow rates elicit significantly lower transition speeds for both the Walk–Run and Run–Walk transition, as expected. Similarly, higher flow rates elicit significantly lower preferred walking speeds. These results suggest that visual information becomes calibrated to mechanical or energetic aspects of gait and contributes to the control of locomotor behavior.

[1]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion , 1997 .

[2]  K. Newell,et al.  Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy , 1998 .

[3]  A Hreljac,et al.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Pailhous,et al.  Unintentional modulations of human gait by optical flow , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Adiabatic transformability hypothesis of human locomotion , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  A. Minetti,et al.  The transition between walking and running in humans: metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. , 1994, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Design Specifications for the Second Generation Sarcos Treadport Locomotion Interface , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[9]  K. M. Newell,et al.  Perceived task expectations and the walk-run gait transition , 2002 .

[10]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment , 2007, TAP.

[11]  K. Pearson,et al.  Fictive motor patterns in chronic spinal cats. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R. J. Gregor,et al.  Weight-bearing hindlimb stepping in treadmill-exercised adult spinal cats , 1990, Brain Research.

[13]  R. Escamilla,et al.  Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion. , 2002, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[14]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Adaptations to changing speed in human locomotion: speed of transition between walking and running. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion Modulation to changes in optic flow , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Walking and running , 1984, The Mathematical Gazette.

[17]  David N. Lee Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[18]  J. Konczak Effects of optic flow on the kinematics of human gait: a comparison of young and older adults. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Philippe Malcolm,et al.  Treadmill versus overground run to walk and walk to run transition speed in unsteady state locomotion conditions , 2005 .

[21]  Jacques Mercier,et al.  Energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory responses at the transition between walking and running , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[22]  C T Farley,et al.  A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses. , 1991, Science.

[23]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Effect of reduced gravity on the preferred walk-run transition speed. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  B. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of Locomotion due to Visual Motion in a Treadmill-based Virtual Environment , 2005 .

[26]  S. Grillner,et al.  On the central generation of locomotion in the low spinal cat , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The sources of external work in level walking and running. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Energetics of running: a new perspective , 1990, Nature.

[29]  B A Kay,et al.  Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Attentional focus influences the walk–run transition in human locomotion , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[31]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[32]  R. Margaria,et al.  Energy cost of running. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Swing- and support-related muscle actions differentially trigger human walk-run and run-walk transitions. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  H. B. Falls,et al.  Energy cost of running and walking in young women. , 1976, Medicine and science in sports.

[35]  S. Rossignol,et al.  A comparison of treadmill locomotion in adult cats before and after spinal transection. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Rodolfo Margaria,et al.  Biomechanics and Energetics of Muscular Exercise , 1976 .

[37]  S. Gatesy,et al.  Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans , 1991 .

[38]  E. Eidelberg,et al.  Stepping by chronic spinal cats , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.