A Study on Seismic Big Data Handling at Seismic Exploration Industry

Cumulative size as well as a changeable pattern of composed geographical large data boons issues in storage, handling, unfolding, studying, anticipating and proving the eminence of input data files. These issues become big challenges, especially in the oil and gas industries. At the same time, seismic exploration is to cultivate an image of the subsurface geology. The geophysical exploration in overall and seismic acquisition in specific is challenged vastly in terms of the tough logistics and intricate subsurface geology. Hence, this research proposes a unified technique to figure out time complexity in large seismic data dispensation with parallel processing, smart indexing and reducing latency time. Furthermore, this research uses a combined platform of Hadoop and Hive where MapReduce analyzes the data and HDFS stores it after processing. The result shows its high time efficiencies by offering high throughputs, I/O rates as well as low latencies.

[1]  Cristian Bucur,et al.  A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments and notes , 2011, 2011 RoEduNet International Conference 10th Edition: Networking in Education and Research.

[2]  N. Tapus,et al.  Practical application and evaluation of no-SQL databases in Cloud Computing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[3]  Timothy G. Armstrong,et al.  LinkBench: a database benchmark based on the Facebook social graph , 2013, SIGMOD '13.

[4]  Irfan Akca,et al.  Applications of hybrid genetic algorithms in seismic tomography , 2011 .

[5]  Ma Zhonghua.  Seismic data attribute extraction based on Hadoop platform , 2017, 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA).

[6]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  From Relations to Multi-dimensional Maps: Towards an SQL-to-HBase Transformation Methodology , 2015, 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing.

[7]  Kjersti Engan,et al.  Image compression using learned dictionaries by RLS-DLA and compared with K-SVD , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[8]  Shelly Sachdeva,et al.  Performance comparison for data storage - Db4o and MySQL databases , 2014, 2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3).

[9]  Shastri L. Nimmagadda,et al.  Data warehousing and mining technologies for adaptability in turbulent resources business environments , 2011, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min..

[10]  Chia-Yen Chen,et al.  Remote cloud data center backup using HBase and Cassandra with user-friendly GUI , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan.

[11]  Yidong Cui,et al.  Distributed storage of network measurement data on HBase , 2012, 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems.

[12]  S. Bhowmick,et al.  Big Data Analytics for Micro-Seismic Monitoring , 2018 .

[13]  Ramon Lawrence.  Integration and Virtualization of Relational SQL and NoSQL Systems Including MySQL and MongoDB , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence.

[14]  Mario Di Francesco,et al.  Cloud Databases for Internet-of-Things Data , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things(iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom).

[15]  Shastri L. Nimmagadda,et al.  On new emerging concepts of petroleum digital ecosystem , 2012, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[16]  Xuesong Yan,et al.  Research on the parameter inversion problem of prestack seismic data based on improved differential evolution algorithm , 2017, Cluster Computing.

[17]  M. N. Vora,et al.  Hadoop-HBase for large-scale data , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology.