Evaluating turnout composite layering strategies for reducing thermal burden in structural firefighter protective clothing systems

A modular approach for arranging the component layers used in the construction of structural firefighter turnout garments is explored as a strategy for reducing the thermal burden contributed by these protective garments to firefighter heat stress. An instrumented sweating manikin was used to measure the insulation, evaporative resistance and total heat loss through turnout systems configured to represent different layering strategies. The outer shell, moisture barrier and thermal liner layers of the structural turnout base composite were tested individually to determine each layer's thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Multiple two- and three-layer combinations were analyzed for their application in specific working conditions. This study demonstrates that the moisture barrier layer contributes the most resistance to evaporative heat loss through the turnout system, while dry heat loss is most restricted by the thermal liner component. Removal of a single inner liner layer was equally beneficial for heat loss, regardless of material properties. It shows the potential benefit of turnout design strategy that utilizes a modular or adaptive layering approach to reduce turnout-related heat strain in conditions consistent with fire protection.

[1]  A Duggan,et al.  Energy cost of stepping in protective clothing ensembles. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[2]  I. Holmér Protective clothing in hot environments. , 2006, Industrial health.

[3]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  Translation between Heat Loss Measured Using Guarded Sweating Hot Plate, Sweating Manikin, and Physiologically Assessed Heat Stress of Firefighter Turnout Ensembles , 2012 .

[4]  Roger Barker,et al.  A review of garment ventilation strategies for structural firefighter protective clothing , 2016 .

[5]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  From fabric hand to thermal comfort: the evolving role of objective measurements in explaining human comfort response to textiles , 2002 .

[6]  G Havenith,et al.  Relationship between clothing ventilation and thermal insulation. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[7]  Gary M. Kurlick Stop, Drop, and Roll: Workplace Hazards of Local Government Firefighters, 2009 , 2012 .

[8]  Emiel A. Den Hartog,et al.  Challenges in Future Personal Protective Equipment – An Overview of Developments in User Needs , 2010 .

[9]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  Total heat loss as a predictor of physiological response in wildland firefighter gear , 2016 .

[10]  George Havenith,et al.  Clothing ventilation, vapour resistance and permeability index: changes dus to posture, movement and wind , 1990 .

[11]  S A Nunneley,et al.  Heat stress in protective clothing. Interactions among physical and physiological factors. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  Tom M McLellan,et al.  The management of heat stress for the firefighter: a review of work conducted on behalf of the Toronto Fire Service. , 2006, Industrial health.

[13]  G Havenith,et al.  Heat balance when wearing protective clothing. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  Jeffrey O. Stull,et al.  Protective Clothing and Equipment Performance Requirements for Fire Service Urban Search and Rescue Teams , 1996 .

[15]  G. Havenith,et al.  Correction of clothing insulation for movement and wind effects, a meta-analysis , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[16]  Marika A Walker From Sweating Plates to Manikins: Evaluating the Role of Clothing in Reducing the Risk of Heat Stress in Wildland Firefighting. , 2013 .