Increased sensitivity with automated validation of XL‐MS cleavable peptide crosslinks

Motivation: Peptides crosslinked with cleavable chemical crosslinkers are identified with mass spectrometry by independent database search of spectra associated with the two linked peptides. A major challenge is to combine together the evidence of the two peptides into an overall assessment of the two‐peptide crosslink. Results: Here, we describe software that models crosslink specific information to automatically validate XL‐MS cleavable peptide crosslinks. Using a dataset of crosslinked protein mixtures, we demonstrate that it computes accurate and highly discriminating probabilities, enabling as many as 75% more identifications than was previously possible using only search scores and a predictable false discovery rate. Availability and implementation: XLinkProphet software is freely available on the web at http://brucelab.gs.washington.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  Alessandro Costa,et al.  The architecture and function of the chromatin replication machinery. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Natalie I. Tasman,et al.  iProphet: Multi-level Integrative Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data Improves Peptide and Protein Identification Rates and Error Estimates* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  Chunxiang Zheng,et al.  Probing the protein interaction network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells by chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry. , 2015, Structure.

[4]  Michael Götze,et al.  Automated Assignment of MS/MS Cleavable Cross-Links in Protein 3D-Structure Analysis , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[5]  Andrew N. Holding,et al.  XL-MS: Protein cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry. , 2015, Methods.

[6]  Vagisha Sharma,et al.  XLink-DB: database and software tools for storing and visualizing protein interaction topology data. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  J. Eng,et al.  Comet: An open‐source MS/MS sequence database search tool , 2013, Proteomics.

[8]  Lan Huang,et al.  Design of CID-cleavable protein cross-linkers: identical mass modifications for simpler sequence analysis. , 2015, Organic and biomolecular chemistry.

[9]  Matthew A. Watson,et al.  Characterization of the interaction between HMGB1 and H3—a possible means of positioning HMGB1 in chromatin , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Arlo Z. Randall,et al.  Development of a Novel Cross-linking Strategy for Fast and Accurate Identification of Cross-linked Peptides of Protein Complexes* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry: An Integrated Technology to Understand the Structure and Function of Molecular Machines. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[13]  Juan D Chavez,et al.  Mango: A General Tool for Collision Induced Dissociation-Cleavable Cross-Linked Peptide Identification. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  F. Regnier,et al.  Coupling protein complex analysis to peptide based proteomics. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[15]  Li Yang,et al.  In vivo protein interaction network identified with a novel real-time cross-linked peptide identification strategy. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[16]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[18]  Maya Topf,et al.  The Importance of Non-accessible Crosslinks and Solvent Accessible Surface Distance in Modeling Proteins with Restraints From Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry* , 2016, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  G. Anderson,et al.  Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions and Topologies in Living Cells with Chemical Cross-linking and Mass Spectrometry*S , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  Robert J. Chalkley,et al.  Matching Cross-linked Peptide Spectra: Only as Good as the Worse Identification* , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  Devin K Schweppe,et al.  In Vivo Conformational Dynamics of Hsp90 and Its Interactors. , 2016, Cell chemical biology.

[22]  Rosa Viner,et al.  Optimized fragmentation schemes and data analysis strategies for proteome-wide cross-link identification , 2017, Nature Communications.

[23]  Jimmy K. Eng,et al.  Quantitative interactome analysis reveals a chemoresistant edgotype , 2015, Nature Communications.

[24]  Chanokphat Phadungath,et al.  Casein micelle structure: a concise review , 2005 .