Surfaces versus features in visual search
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[2] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .
[3] K. Nakayama,et al. Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion Correspondence , 1990, Perception.
[4] B. Julesz. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.
[5] Ken Nakayama,et al. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.
[6] R Fox,et al. Depth separation and lateral interference , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] K Nakayama,et al. Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.
[8] V. Ramachandran,et al. On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.
[9] A. Treisman,et al. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[10] J. Beck. Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .
[11] K Nakayama,et al. Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.
[12] P Perona,et al. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[13] G. Kanizsa,et al. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .
[14] K. Nakayama,et al. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.
[15] James R. Bergen,et al. Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.