Time coordination of standalone measurement instruments by synchronized triggering

A Hardware Interface (HI) to synchronize the operations of standalone Measurement Instruments (MIs) in the absence of networking has been proposed in the recent literature. The synchronization accuracy achieved is one period of the clock equipping the HI. To improve the synchronization accuracy two solutions can be argued on the basis of the mathematical model of the delay between HIs. The first involves increasing the clock frequency; the second concerns the compensation of the phase delay between HI clocks. In this paper the second solution is adopted in order to: (i) reduce the energy consumption, and (ii) not increase the complexity of the hardware architecture. The phase delay compensation is obtained by introducing a programmable delay line after the HI clocks. The phase delay evaluation and the successive tuning of the delay line are performed in the synchronization phase of the HIs. Once synchronized, each HI is moved to the standalone MI to trigger it according to the common sense of time. During the execution of the measurement procedure, networking is not necessary. Experimental tests validate the correct operation of the upgraded HI architecture and indicate that the achievable synchronization accuracy is a low percentage of the HI clock period.

[1]  Kris Steenhaut,et al.  Low-overhead time synchronization for schedule-based multi-channel wireless sensor networks , 2013, 2013 19th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN).

[2]  G. Guglielmelli,et al.  Synchronization of Measurement Instruments Co-operating into the W-DMS , 2007, 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007.

[3]  Nobuhiro Shimoi,et al.  Estimation of dynamic properties of traditional wooden structures using new bolt sensor , 2013, 2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013).

[4]  Francesco Lamonaca,et al.  Monitoring of environmental parameters and pollution by fungal spores in the National Gallery of Cosenza: A case of study , 2014 .

[5]  Thomas E. Levy,et al.  OpenDig: In-field data recording for archaeology and cultural heritage , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[6]  Domenico Luca Carnì,et al.  IMPROVED SYNCHRONIZING PROCEDURE OF PDAS TO DELIVERY THE COMMON SENSE OF THE TIME TO STAND ALONE MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 2009 .

[7]  Bo Jiang,et al.  Opportunistic Flooding in Low-Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks with Unreliable Links , 2014, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[8]  Domenico Grimaldi,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling of Trigger Command for Sub-Microsecond Alignment Accuracy in Distributed Measurement System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Jun Zhao Minimum node degree and k-connectivity in wireless networks with unreliable links , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[10]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  A New Method of Dynamic Latent-Variable Modeling for Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Salvatore Marano,et al.  Controlled Interference Mitigation MAC for UWB Networks with Quality of Service Support , 2007, 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[12]  Domenico Grimaldi,et al.  Trigger Realignment by Networking Synchronized Embedded Hardware , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  I-Hong Hou,et al.  Broadcasting delay-constrained traffic over unreliable wireless links with network coding , 2011, MobiHoc '11.

[14]  Martin Horauer,et al.  Problems and solutions for refitting a sensor network with IEEE1588 clock synchronisation , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[15]  Xinbing Wang,et al.  Node Density and Delay in Large-Scale Wireless Networks With Unreliable Links , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  Bo Jiang,et al.  Opportunistic Flooding in Low-Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks with Unreliable Links , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[17]  Salvatore Marano,et al.  Exploiting online and offline activity-based metrics for opportunistic forwarding , 2014, Wireless Networks.

[18]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Development of a Bridge Weigh-in-Motion Sensor: Performance Comparison Using Fiber Optic and Electric Resistance Strain Sensor Systems , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[19]  Zhang Ning,et al.  Application of IEEE1588 in time synchronizing system of smart distribution grid , 2014 .

[20]  Domenico Grimaldi,et al.  Distributed measurement systems , 2001 .

[21]  Abdennaceur Kachouri,et al.  Synchronization in wireless sensors networks using balanced clusters , 2013, 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC).

[22]  Dhiren Kashyap,et al.  Comparative analysis of time synchronization schemes for wireless sensor networks , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Signal Propagation and Computer Technology (ICSPCT 2014).

[23]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  End-to-End Delay Measurement in Wireless Sensor Networks without Synchronization , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[24]  Andrea Gasparri,et al.  Clock Synchronization in Wireless Sensor Network With Selective Convergence Rate for Event Driven Measurement Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[25]  Mitchell A. Thornton,et al.  System-on-Chip Power Consumption Refinement and Analysis , 2007, 2007 6th IEEE Dallas Circuits and Systems Workshop on System-on-Chip.