Fishing For Feelings? Hooking Viewers Helps!

To better understand individual variation in emotional responses to advertising, the authors recommend considering three general factors: characteristics of the individual who sees the ad, characteristics of the ad itself, and the nature of the ad/individual interface. This paper examines one aspect of the individual, affect intensity; one aspect of the ad, the degree to which the ad tells a story; and one aspect of the ad/individual interface, whether the individual is hooked by the ad. Experimental results reveal that an individual's being hooked by an ad has a positive relationship with upbeat and warm feelings, a negative relationship with disinterested feelings, and significantly enhances the viewer's attitude toward the ad. We find that affect intensity has a positive relationship with upbeat and warm feelings, and affect intensity moderates the effect of being hooked on upbeat and warm feelings. Findings also reveal that narrative ad structure has a positive relationship with upbeat and warm feelings, a negative relationship with disinterested feelings, and that being hooked moderates the effect of narrative ad structure on upbeat and warm feelings responses.

[1]  J. Edell,et al.  The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects , 1987 .

[2]  Julie A. Edell,et al.  The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition , 1989 .

[3]  Barbara Stern.  Classical and vignette television advertising dramas: Structural models, formal analysis, and consumer effects. , 1994 .

[4]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Using Drama to Persuade , 1989 .

[5]  R. Larsen,et al.  Cognitive operations associated with individual differences in affect intensity. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  Effects of Initial Product Judgments on Subsequent Memory-Based Judgments , 1986 .

[7]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[8]  Julie A. Edell,et al.  Emotion in Advertising: Theoretical and Practical Explorations , 1990 .

[9]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects , 1986 .

[10]  Richard S. Lazanis.  Stress and emotion, a new synthesis , 1999 .

[11]  D. Schopflocher,et al.  The role of absorption in experiential involvement. , 1995 .

[12]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[13]  R. Larsen,et al.  Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review , 1987 .

[14]  James C. Anderson,et al.  On the Meaning of Within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors , 1984 .

[15]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[16]  Donald E. Polkinghorne,et al.  Narrative and Self-Concept , 1991 .

[17]  D. Moore,et al.  Affect Intensity: An Individual Difference Response to Advertising Appeals , 1995 .

[18]  Ed Diener,et al.  Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. , 1986 .

[19]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising , 1988 .

[20]  Tom Barbash.  On top of the world , 2003 .

[21]  David J. Moore.  Affect intensity and empathic emotions: an individual difference measure of advertising response , 1995 .

[22]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Informational and Transformational Advertising: the Differential Effects of Time , 1984 .

[23]  R. Lazarus.  Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[24]  Linda M. Scott,et al.  The Bridge from Text to Mind: Adapting Reader-Response Theory to Consumer Research , 1994 .

[25]  P. Ekman,et al.  The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. , 1994 .