Conscious visual representations built from multiple binding processes: evidence from neuropsychology.

I review neuropsychological evidence, from patients with selective brain lesions, indicating that there can be several kinds of binding in vision. Damage to early processes within the ventral visual stream impairs the binding of contours into shapes. This impairment can leave unaffected a more elementary operation of binding form elements into contours. Thus the process of binding elements into a contour is distinct from the process of binding contours into more wholistic shapes. In other patients with damage to the parietal lobe, there can be poor binding of shape to surface information in objects. This problem in turn can co-exist with a relatively intact process of binding of contours into shapes. These findings suggest that there are multiple stages of binding in vision, including binding to derive shape descriptions (in the ventral visual stream) and binding shape and surface detail together (involving interactions between the ventral and dorsal streams). I also discuss evidence for transient binding based on common onsets of stimuli. I conclude that the unity of consciousness is derived from several separable neural processes of binding.

[1]  Ennio De Renzi,et al.  The Fuzzy Boundaries of Apperceptive Agnosia , 1993, Cortex.

[2]  R. Ward,et al.  Anti-extinction Following Unilateral Parietal Damage , 1997 .

[3]  Ronald A. Rensink Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[4]  G. Humphreys Case studies in the neuropsychology of vision , 1999 .

[5]  A. Milner,et al.  Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[6]  I. Kovács Human development of perceptual organization , 2000, Vision Research.

[7]  G W Humphreys,et al.  3-D constraints on spatially parallel shape perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features , 2000, Vision Research.

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  ARTHUR P. GINSBURG,et al.  Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary? , 1975, Nature.

[15]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Cognitive neuropsychology and functional brain imaging: implications for functional and anatomical models of cognition. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[16]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[17]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  M. Donk Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: The effects of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. , 1999 .

[19]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Eckhorn Neural Mechanisms of Visual Feature Binding Investigated with Microelectrodes and Models , 1999 .

[21]  M Fahle,et al.  Figure–ground discrimination from temporal information , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Claude Prablanc,et al.  Neural control of space coding and action production , 2003 .

[23]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Memories are made of this: the effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  R. Rafal,et al.  Attention and Feature Integration: Illusory Conjunctions in a Patient with a Parietal Lobe Lesion , 1991 .

[25]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Spatially Parallel Processing of Within-Dimension Conjunctions , 2001, Perception.

[26]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Sur,et al.  Orientation Maps of Subjective Contours in Visual Cortex , 1996, Science.

[29]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[30]  G. Humphreys,et al.  A case of integrative visual agnosia. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  C. Butter,et al.  Integrative Agnosia Following Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy , 1994, Cortex.

[32]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[33]  S. Yantis,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Michael J. Hawken,et al.  Macaque VI neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours , 1993, Nature.

[36]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Texture segregation, surface representation and figure–ground separation , 1998, Vision Research.

[38]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[40]  R. Bálint Seelenlähmung des “Schauens”, optische Ataxie, räumliche Störung der Aufmerksamkeit. pp. 51–66 , 1909 .

[41]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[43]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[44]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The computation of perceptual structure from collinearity and closure: Normality and pathology , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[46]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Interactions between attention, context and learning in primary visual cortex , 2000, Vision Research.

[47]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[49]  P. Kellman,et al.  Perception of Partly Occluded Objects and Illusory Figures : Evidence for an Identity Hypothesis , 2004 .

[50]  H. Müller,et al.  Synchronous Information Presented in 40-HZ Flicker Enhances Visual Feature Binding , 1998 .

[51]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans , 1994, Nature.

[52]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The real object advantage in agnosia: Evidence of a role for shading and depth in object recognition , 2000 .

[53]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[54]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[57]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[58]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence for early computation prior to shape binding and figure-ground coding , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[60]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Feature integration that routinely occurs without focal attention , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[62]  James T. Enns,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995 .

[63]  O. D. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Axis-based grouping reduces visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[66]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[67]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The Effects of View in Depth on the Identification of Line Drawings and Silhouettes of Familiar Objects: Normality and Pathology , 1999 .

[68]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The real-object advantage in agnosia: Evidence for a role of surface and depth information in object recognition , 2001, Cognitive Neuropsychology.