Orbital Lymphoma and Subacute or Chronic Inflammatory Pseudotumor: Differentiation with Two-Phase Helical Computed Tomography

Objective The differentiation between orbital lymphoma and subacute or chronic inflammatory pseudotumor (SCIPT) may be difficult clinically and radiologically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the enhancement characteristics of orbital lymphoma and SCIPT with two-phase helical computed tomography (CT) and delayed coronal CT and to determine whether attenuation measurements on CT can be used to differentiate between the 2 diseases. Methods Nineteen histopathologically proven orbital lymphomas and 9 SCIPTs were examined with two-phase helical CT. After injecting 90 mL contrast material at a rate of 3 mL/s, early- and late-phase axial CT scans were obtained with scanning delays of 30 and 90 seconds, respectively. Delayed coronal scans were obtained with delays of 4–9 minutes. Attenuation of the lesions at each phase was measured quantitatively. Relative percentages of contrast enhancement (CE) were calculated to determine the cutoff value for differentiating SCIPT from lymphoma. Results The CT attenuation change over time was significantly different between orbital lymphoma and SCIPT (P < 0.05). Increased CT attenuation between early- and late-phase axial scans was seen in 42% (n = 8) of lymphoma cases, and decreased CT attenuation was seen in 58% (n = 11). In 17 lymphomas (90%), the CT attenuation decreased between late-phase axial and delayed coronal scans. Conversely, in 7 SCIPTs (78%), the CT attenuation increased gradually over time from early-phase axial to delayed coronal scans. The relative percentage of CE at the delayed coronal scan had a cutoff value of −6.97%, a sensitivity of 84%, and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion Different characteristics of attenuation change on two-phase helical CT and delayed coronal CT can be helpful in differentiating between orbital lymphoma and SCIPT.

[1]  W. Gilboy,et al.  The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  F. Jakobiec,et al.  Lymphoproliferative disease of the orbit. , 1996, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[3]  W. Binks.  Radiological protection. , 1960, Radiography.

[4]  Y. Ko,et al.  Salivary gland tumors: evaluation with two-phase helical CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  A. Garner,et al.  Orbital lymphoma versus reactive lymphoid hyperplasia: an analysis of the use of computed tomography in differential diagnosis. , 1991, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  I. Zammit-Maempel.  Radiation dose to the lens from coronal CT scanning of the sinuses. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[7]  D E Dupuy,et al.  Spiral CT in evaluation of head and neck lesions: work in progress. , 1992, Radiology.

[8]  M. Mafee,et al.  Dynamic computed tomography of the head and neck: differential diagnostic value. , 1985, Radiology.

[9]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Angiogenesis spectrum in the stroma of B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study , 2009, European journal of haematology.

[10]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  CT Attenuation Values and Enhancing Characteristics of Thoracoabdominal Lymphomatous Adenopathies , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  A. Weber,et al.  Pseudotumor of the orbit. Clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. , 1999, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[12]  U. Baum,et al.  Imaging of head and neck tumors--methods: CT, spiral-CT, multislice-spiral-CT. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[13]  W. Lawson,et al.  Extracranial tumor vascularity: determination by dynamic CT scanning. Part I: Concepts and signature curves. , 1985, Radiology.

[14]  Harris,et al.  The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997 , 2000, Histopathology.

[15]  M. Langer,et al.  MRI of lymphomas of the orbits and the paranasal sinuses. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[17]  E. Beckman,et al.  Predictability of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of orbital lymphoma from orbital inflammatory syndrome. , 1997, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  H. Hagberg,et al.  Contrast Enhancement of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Demonstrated by Computed Tomography , 1989, Acta radiologica.

[19]  Flanders Ae,et al.  Orbital lymphoma. Role of CT and MRI. , 1987 .

[20]  K Lackner,et al.  Spiral Versus Conventional CT in Routine Examinations of the Neck , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  A. Flanders,et al.  Orbital lymphoma. Role of CT and MRI. , 1987, Radiologic clinics of North America.