The organization of societal conflicts by pavement ants Tetramorium caespitum: an agent-based model of amine-mediated decision making

Abstract Ant colonies self-organize to solve complex problems despite the simplicity of an individual ant’s brain. Pavement ant Tetramorium caespitum colonies must solve the problem of defending the territory that they patrol in search of energetically rich forage. When members of 2 colonies randomly interact at the territory boundary a decision to fight occurs when: 1) there is a mismatch in nestmate recognition cues and 2) each ant has a recent history of high interaction rates with nestmate ants. Instead of fighting, some ants will decide to recruit more workers from the nest to the fighting location, and in this way a positive feedback mediates the development of colony wide wars. In ants, the monoamines serotonin (5-HT) and octopamine (OA) modulate many behaviors associated with colony organization and in particular behaviors associated with nestmate recognition and aggression. In this article, we develop and explore an agent-based model that conceptualizes how individual changes in brain concentrations of 5-HT and OA, paired with a simple threshold-based decision rule, can lead to the development of colony wide warfare. Model simulations do lead to the development of warfare with 91% of ants fighting at the end of 1 h. When conducting a sensitivity analysis, we determined that uncertainty in monoamine concentration signal decay influences the behavior of the model more than uncertainty in the decision-making rule or density. We conclude that pavement ant behavior is consistent with the detection of interaction rate through a single timed interval rather than integration of multiple interactions.

[1]  C. Detrain,et al.  Distributed leadership and adaptive decision-making in the ant Tetramorium caespitum , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  W. Gronenberg Structure and function of ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) brains: Strength in numbers , 2008 .

[3]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[4]  B. Hölldobler Tournaments and slavery in a desert ant. , 1976, Science.

[5]  R. Yamaoka,et al.  Social interactions influence dopamine and octopamine homeostasis in the brain of the ant Formica japonica , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Morphologic representation of visual and antennal information in the ant brain , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Phil McMinn,et al.  Modelling complex biological systems using an agent-based approach. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[9]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. Martin,et al.  A Review of Ant Cuticular Hydrocarbons , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[12]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users' Guide , 1998, MABS.

[13]  Elva J H Robinson,et al.  An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Mushroom body volumes and visual interneurons in ants: Comparison between sexes and castes , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  S. Robson,et al.  Polymorphism and division of labour in a socially complex ant: neuromodulation of aggression in the Australian weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  S. Koyama,et al.  Octopamine and cooperation: octopamine regulates the disappearance of cooperative behaviours between genetically unrelated founding queens in the ant , 2015, Biology Letters.

[18]  Steven C Bankes,et al.  Agent-based modeling: A revolution? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Collective search by ants in microgravity , 2015, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[20]  Lawrence M Leemis,et al.  Univariate Distribution Relationships , 2008 .

[21]  J. Silverman,et al.  Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[22]  D. Morale,et al.  An interacting particle system modelling aggregation behavior: from individuals to populations , 2005, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  Luann Buchholz,et al.  Effective leadership. , 2011, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[24]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[27]  J. Korczyńska,et al.  The effects of serotonin, dopamine, octopamine and tyramine on behavior of workers of the ant Formica polyctena during dyadic aggression tests. , 2013, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[28]  D. Gordon,et al.  Nestmate recognition in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review , 2012 .

[29]  R. Yamaoka,et al.  Ant Nestmate and Non-Nestmate Discrimination by a Chemosensory Sensillum , 2005, Science.

[30]  H. Aonuma,et al.  Octopaminergic System in the Brain Controls Aggressive Motivation in the Ant, Formica Japonica , 2012, Acta biologica Hungarica.

[31]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants "behave" like molecules? , 2006 .

[33]  Sifat Momen Ant-inspired Decentralized Task Allocation Strategy in Groups of Mobile Agents , 2013, Complex Adaptive Systems.

[34]  J. Swallow,et al.  Whole brain monoamine detection and manipulation in a stalk-eyed fly , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[36]  E. Robinson,et al.  How collective comparisons emerge without individual comparisons of the options , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[38]  R. Boulay,et al.  Octopamine reverses the isolation-induced increase in trophallaxis in the carpenter ant Camponotus fellah. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[39]  S. Pérez-Espona Ant Encounters. Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior Ant Encounters. Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior. By Deborah Gordon. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press (2010). Pp. xiv+167. Price £13.95 paperback. , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  D. Gordon,et al.  Ecology: ‘Devil's gardens’ bedevilled by ants , 2005, Nature.

[42]  Ilhem Allagui,et al.  The Arab Spring and the Role of ICTs Editorial Introduction , 2011 .

[43]  Franco Bagnoli,et al.  Modeling ant battles by means of a diffusion-limited Gillespie algorithm. , 2014, Theoretical biology forum.

[44]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[45]  J. Traniello,et al.  Biogenic Amines and Collective Organization in a Superorganism: Neuromodulation of Social Behavior in Ants , 2013, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[46]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[47]  M. Hare,et al.  Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management , 2004, Math. Comput. Simul..