Working Hard to Take the Easy Way Out: How the Need for Cognitive Closure Shapes Strategic Effort Investment to Ease Future Decision Making

Consumers make countless decisions each day that force them to determine the amount of effort they are willing to invest into the decision process. Due to their desire for immediate resolution and propensity to seize upon available options, individuals high in the need for cognitive closure make decisions that are traditionally associated with reduced effort investment. Counter to this traditional perspective, this research demonstrates that those seeking closure strategically invest effort into the decision process, so long as the initial effort investment is expected to simplify similar decisions in the future. Three experiments demonstrate that those motivated by closure put forth greater effort when they expect to repeat the decision (Experiment 1) and in contexts where a justifiable choice option is not readily available (Experiment 2). Furthermore, this effort investment is shown to payoff in terms of streamlining subsequent decision making (Experiment 3). These findings detail the strategic use of effort by those seeking closure to ease future decision making and thus provide a conceptual framework for when and why those seeking closure allocate effort in decision making.

[1]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[2]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[3]  E. Tulving How many memory systems are there , 1985 .

[4]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  The Role of the Need for Cognitive Closure in the Effectiveness of the Disrupt-Then-Reframe Influence Technique , 2007 .

[5]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[6]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Inferences from decision difficulty , 2006 .

[7]  Alan Schwartz,et al.  Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-Timing Decisions , 2001 .

[8]  Alain Van Hiel,et al.  Why Some Hate to Dilly-Dally and Others Do Not: The Arousal-Invoking Capacity of Decision-Making for Low- and High-Scoring Need for Closure Individuals , 2008 .

[9]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[10]  R. Petty,et al.  Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior , 1995 .

[11]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  C. Anderson The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al.  Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.

[14]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[15]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. , 2014, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[16]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[17]  A. Kruglanski The Psychology of Closed Mindedness , 2004 .

[18]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Please, let's get an answer—any answer: Need for consumer cognitive closure , 2000 .

[19]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ashley S. Otto,et al.  Decision sidestepping: How the motivation for closure prompts individuals to bypass decision making. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[22]  I. Vermeir,et al.  The influence of need for closure on consumer's choice behaviour , 2002 .

[23]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[24]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment , 1995 .