An Evolutionary Analysis of Learned Attention

Humans and many other species selectively attend to stimuli or stimulus dimensions-but why should an animal constrain information input in this way? To investigate the adaptive functions of attention, we used a genetic algorithm to evolve simple connectionist networks that had to make categorization decisions in a variety of environmental structures. The results of these simulations show that while learned attention is not universally adaptive, its benefit is not restricted to the reduction of input complexity in order to keep it within an organism's processing capacity limitations. Instead, being able to shift attention provides adaptive benefit by allowing faster learning with fewer errors in a range of ecologically plausible environments.

[1]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[2]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[3]  R Dukas,et al.  Costs of memory: ideas and predictions. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Computational Models of Conditioning: Evolution of attention in learning , 2010 .

[5]  Jory Johnson,et al.  Predator Avoidance in Lab-Reared Juvenile Rough-Skinned Newts, Taricha granulosa , 2013 .

[6]  B. Love Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Kruschke Base rates in category learning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[9]  T. Johnston Selective costs and benefits of in the evolution of learning , 1996 .

[10]  Ana García Gutiérrez,et al.  The role of the number of cues on retroactive interference in human predictive learning , 2003 .

[11]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[12]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[13]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Ronaldo Vigo,et al.  Journal of Mathematical Psychology Categorical Invariance and Structural Complexity in Human Concept Learning , 2022 .

[15]  J. Kruschke Models of Attentional Learning , 2011 .

[16]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  S. Laughlin Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Dimensional Relevance Shifts in Category Learning , 1996, Connect. Sci..

[19]  Richard A. Hullinger An evolutionary analysis of selective attention , 2011 .

[20]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Chapter 5 Highlighting , 2009 .

[21]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Comparing modes of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[22]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A Rational Analysis of Rule-Based Concept Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Samuel P. León,et al.  Giving contexts informative value makes information context-specific. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[25]  Stephen E. Denton,et al.  Attention and salience in associative blocking , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[26]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning , 2000, Nature.

[27]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Contextual modulation of attention in human category learning , 2012, Learning & behavior.

[28]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Human Category Learning: Implications for Backpropagation Models , 1993 .

[29]  M. Bouton Context, Ambiguity, and Classical Conditioning , 1994 .

[30]  J. Kruschke Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning , 2001 .

[31]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The acquisition of Boolean concepts , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Dukas,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Limited Attention , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[33]  J. Kruschke Attention in Learning , 2003 .

[34]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .