The Matthew effect in China’s science: evidence from academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Utilizing a unique dataset of the Chinese Academy of Sciences academicians (1993–2013), this paper investigates the Matthew effect in China’s science. Three indicators, namely the concentration index, the Matthew index and the coefficient of variation, are adopted to measure the uneven distribution of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences among different regions and disciplines. The empirical analysis demonstrates the existence of the Matthew effect in China’s science for the above two dimensions. Yet, this effect has weakened for all regions with the exception of Beijing. We argue that this uneven distribution of the nation’s brightest minds makes scientifically competitive regions and disciplines even more competitive while putting those less developed regions and research domains at further disadvantage.

[1]  Li Tang,et al.  China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics , 2011, Scientometrics.

[2]  Mahmood Khosrowjerdi,et al.  Proximity and Matthew Effect in co-authorship pattern of Iranian top universities , 2012 .

[3]  M. Bothner,et al.  When Do Matthew Effects Occur? , 2010 .

[4]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[5]  S. Shane,et al.  Determinants of invention commercialization: an empirical examination of academically sourced inventions , 2007 .

[6]  Michael Strevens.  The role of the Matthew effect in science , 2006 .

[7]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[8]  Manfred Bonitz.  Ten years Matthew effect for countries , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The "Matthew Effect" in R&D Public Subsidies: the Italian Evidence , 2013 .

[10]  Cecelia M. Brown.  The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series and the flow of scientific communication through the World Wide Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Li Tang,et al.  Regional development and interregional collaboration in the growth of nanotechnology research in China , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Cong Cao.  The Chinese Academy of Sciences: The Election of Scientists into the Elite Group , 1998 .

[13]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[14]  Vladimir Pislyakov,et al.  Citation expectations: are they realized? Study of the Matthew index for Russian papers published abroad , 2009, Scientometrics.

[15]  Jian Wang,et al.  Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[16]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[17]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of China , 2012, Scientometrics.

[18]  Jan L. Youtie,et al.  Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation Increases? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Li Tang,et al.  Does "birds of a feather flock together" matter - Evidence from a longitudinal study on US-China scientific collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Wang Wei.  Evolution of temporal and spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of agglomerative growth of senior science talents:A case study of academicians of CAS , 2013 .

[21]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Financial Innovation and the Management and Regulation of Financial Institutions , 1995 .

[22]  M. BONITZ,et al.  Characteristics and impact of the matthew effect for countries , 1997, Scientometrics.

[23]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[24]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[25]  Mohammad Hossein Biglu,et al.  The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect , 2007, Scientometrics.

[26]  R. Banker,et al.  Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences , 2011 .

[27]  Xu Fei.  The Matthew effect in Chinese academy of science academician election——a case study of academician election of 2001-2009 , 2011 .

[28]  D. Medin,et al.  Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Similarity Judgments with Semantically Rich Stimuli , 1997 .

[29]  Liu Ze-yuan.  Is There Matthew Effect in International Collaboration of Mechanics Research , 2006 .

[30]  Hu Shu-hua.  Study on Matthew Effect in National Hi-Tech Zones in Chinaand Spatial Layout of National Innovation Demonstration Zones , 2011 .

[31]  Xin Pan,et al.  Visualizing knowledge space: a case study of Chinese licensed technology, 2000–2012 , 2014, Scientometrics.