Thermal performance simulation of a solar cavity receiver under windy conditions

Abstract Solar cavity receiver plays a dominant role in the light–heat conversion. Its performance can directly affect the efficiency of the whole power generation system. A combined calculation method for evaluating the thermal performance of the solar cavity receiver is raised in this paper. This method couples the Monte-Carlo method, the correlations of the flow boiling heat transfer, and the calculation of air flow field. And this method can ultimately figure out the surface heat flux inside the cavity, the wall temperature of the boiling tubes, and the heat loss of the solar receiver with an iterative solution. With this method, the thermal performance of a solar cavity receiver, a saturated steam receiver, is simulated under different wind environments. The highest wall temperature of the boiling tubes is about 150 °C higher than the water saturation temperature. And it appears in the upper middle parts of the absorbing panels. Changing the wind angle or velocity can obviously affect the air velocity inside the receiver. The air velocity reaches the maximum value when the wind comes from the side of the receiver (flow angle α = 90°). The heat loss of the solar cavity receiver also reaches a maximum for the side-on wind.

[1]  Wei Xiu-dong.  Shadow of Heliostat Fleld in the Solar Tower Power Plant , 2009 .

[2]  S. Kandlikar,et al.  Development of a Flow Boiling Map for Subcooled and Saturated Flow Boiling of Different Fluids Inside Circular Tubes , 1991 .

[3]  Sawat Paitoonsurikarn,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Loss From a Model Solar Concentrator Cavity Receiver , 2004 .

[4]  V. Gnielinski.  New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow , 1976 .

[5]  S. P. Venkateshan,et al.  Interaction of surface radiation with free convection in a square cavity , 1993 .

[6]  S. P. Venkateshan,et al.  Effect of Surface Radiation on Natural Convection in a Square Enclosure , 1999 .

[7]  Y. Hsu.  On the Size Range of Active Nucleation Cavities on a Heating Surface , 1962 .

[8]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  An improved model for natural convection heat loss from modified cavity receiver of solar dish concentrator , 2009 .

[9]  Y. Hsu,et al.  AN ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE THERMAL BOUNDARY LAYER AND EBULLITION CYCLE IN NUCLEATE BOILING , 1961 .

[10]  M. Behnia,et al.  An Experimental and Computational Study of the Heat Loss Characteristics of a Trapezoidal Cavity Absorber , 2004 .

[11]  Manuel Castro,et al.  US-Spain evaluation of the Solar One and CESA-I receiver and storage systems , 1989 .

[12]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  Numerical investigation of natural convection heat loss in modified cavity receiver for fuzzy focal solar dish concentrator , 2007 .

[13]  Yiding Cao,et al.  Convection heat loss from cavity receiver in parabolic dish solar thermal power system: A review , 2010 .

[14]  Sawat Paitoonsurikarn,et al.  A New Correlation for Predicting the Free Convection Loss from Solar Dish Concentrating Receivers , 2006 .

[15]  A. M. Clausing,et al.  An analysis of convective losses from cavity solar central receivers , 1981 .

[16]  M. Modest.  Radiative heat transfer , 1993 .

[17]  E. Bilgen,et al.  Heat transfer in inclined rectangular receivers for concentrated solar radiation , 2008 .

[18]  Hirohisa Matsumura,et al.  On the Conditions of Incipient Subcooled-Boiling with Forced Convection , 1963 .

[19]  Masud Behnia,et al.  Combined radiation and natural convection in a rectangular cavity with a transparent wall and containing a non‐participating fluid , 1990 .

[20]  S. Kandlikar.  A General Correlation for Saturated Two-Phase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Inside Horizontal and Vertical Tubes , 1990 .

[21]  Satish G. Kandlikar,et al.  Heat Transfer Characteristics in Partial Boiling, Fully Developed Boiling, and Significant Void Flow Regions of Subcooled Flow Boiling , 1997, Fluids Engineering.

[22]  A. M. Clausing,et al.  Convective losses from cavity solar receivers--Comparisons between analytical predictions and experimental results , 1983 .