A Consistent Cross-Border Seismic Hazard Methodology for Loss Estimation and Risk Management along the Border Regions of Canada and the United States

We provide a methodology that seamlessly integrates national seismic hazard models across the Canada-U.S. border to provide earthquake risk managers with updated and consistent seismic hazard science and technology in the two countries. Consistent with our U.S. hazard model, we developed a new Canadian model that incorporates (1) spatially varying seismicity for the major metropolitan areas of southeastern and southwestern Canada and the United States, (2) a comprehensive probabilistic model for the Cascadia subduction zone that includes M 8.0–9.2 interface earthquakes, (3) a consistent set of ground motion prediction equations across eastern and western North America, and (4) a soil-based attenuation (SBA) methodology that mitigates uncertainty in the conversion of earthquake motions from rock to soil, on which the majority of exposure is located. NEHRP site conditions are mapped for all of Canada from existing geological data, and NEHRP site factors are used to account for local site conditions.

[1]  D. Perkins,et al.  National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996 , 1996 .

[2]  H. Crow,et al.  Seismic Site Response Analysis for Ottawa, Canada: A Comprehensive Study Using Measurements and Numerical Simulations , 2012 .

[3]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2008 .

[4]  Walter J. Bawiec,et al.  Geology of the conterminous United States at 1:2,500,000 scale a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman map , 1994 .

[5]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  New probabilistic strong seismic ground motion maps of Canada , 1985 .

[6]  Timothy D. Ancheta,et al.  NGA-West2 Research Project , 2014 .

[7]  Maurice Lamontagne,et al.  Significant Canadian Earthquakes of the Period 1600–2006 , 2008 .

[8]  A. Tréhu,et al.  Transpression between two warm mafic plates: The Queen Charlotte Fault revisited , 2000 .

[9]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Site coefficients for design of buildings in eastern United States , 1997 .

[10]  S. Halchuk,et al.  Crossing the Border : Assessing the differences between new Canadian and American seismic hazard maps , 1999 .

[11]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  A Brownian Model for Recurrent Earthquakes , 2002 .

[12]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2) , 2009 .

[13]  Mark D. Petersen,et al.  Simulations of Seismic Hazard for the Pacific Northwest of the United States from Earthquakes Associated with the Cascadia Subduction Zone , 2002 .

[14]  Brian F. Atwater,et al.  Recurrence Intervals for Great Earthquakes of the Past 3,500 Years at Northeastern Willapa Bay, Washington , 1997 .

[15]  S. Halchuk,et al.  Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Maps and grid values to be used with the 2005 National Building Code of Canada , 2008 .

[16]  Daniel E. Bunker,et al.  Tree-ring dating the 1700 Cascadia earthquake , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Investigation of Geographic Rules for Improving Site-Conditions Mapping , 2010 .

[18]  Kenji Satake,et al.  Fault slip and seismic moment of the 1700 Cascadia earthquake inferred from Japanese tsunami descriptions , 2003 .

[19]  William A. Bryant,et al.  A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity , 2000 .

[20]  Kenji Satake,et al.  Time and size of a giant earthquake in Cascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami records of January 1700 , 1996, Nature.

[21]  A. Frankel.  Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States , 1995 .

[22]  W. Szeliga.  2012 Haida Gwaii Quake: Insight Into Cascadia's Subduction Extent , 2013 .

[23]  S. Evans,et al.  An analysis of the 1985 Nahanni earthquakes , 1988 .

[24]  A. Frankel,et al.  Geology in the 1996 USGS Seismic-hazard Maps, Central and Eastern United States , 2000 .

[25]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[26]  Brian F. Atwater,et al.  The Orphan Tsunami of 1700 , 2005 .

[27]  T. Jordan,et al.  OpenSHA: A Developing Community-modeling Environment for Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2003 .

[28]  A. Kafka,et al.  Does the Spatial Distribution of Smaller Earthquakes Delineate Areas Where Larger Earthquakes Are Likely to Occur , 2000 .

[29]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .

[30]  John Adams,et al.  Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada , 2003 .

[31]  Maurice S. Power,et al.  An Overview of the NGA Project , 2008 .

[32]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[33]  C. Wills,et al.  Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California , 2006 .

[34]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  NEHRP Site Amplification Factors and the NGA Relationships , 2010 .