The Social Capital of Global Ties in Science: The Added Value of International Collaboration

The globalization of science is demonstrated in the mobility of scientists across national boundaries, the composition of the U.S. scientific workforce, and increased collaboration across national boundaries. While studies based on bibliometric and other data have been useful in identifying trends, collaborative clusters, and other patterns in international collaboration, they do not reveal the social dynamics behind those collaborations. This paper addresses the human and social capital factors that explain whether or not an academic researcher in science and engineering has an international collaborator. Further, through detailed statistical models, the analysis also addresses the factors that differentiate the specific resources derived from those international ties. Results show that non‐U.S. citizens are more likely to have close international collaborators, but that a range of factors explain this relationship. Further, results show that U.S. academic faculty mobilize different collaborative resources from international collaborators, versus their domestic collaborators.

[1]  N. Lin SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[2]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[3]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[4]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-ups in France , 2004 .

[5]  Nadine Massard,et al.  Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks , 2007 .

[6]  Amalya L. Oliver Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations , 2004 .

[7]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[8]  James S. Dietz,et al.  Building a social capital model of research development: The case of the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research , 2000 .

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Philip S. Morrison,et al.  Research Collaboration Among University Scientists , 2003 .

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Modelling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration. Part II. A comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links , 2006, Scientometrics.

[12]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[13]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social Capital: Theories of Capital , 2001 .

[14]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[15]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  Kevin Au,et al.  Boundary spanning behaviors of expatriates , 2002 .

[17]  H. Ibarra Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[18]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[19]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[20]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Where Is Science Going? , 1996 .

[21]  Heike Jons,et al.  Transnational mobility and the spaces of knowledge production: a comparison of global patterns, motivations and collaborations in different academic fields , 2007 .

[22]  L. Verbrugge Multiplexity in Adult Friendships , 1979 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Jean-Charles Billaut,et al.  Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[25]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Social-Organizational Characteristics of Work and Publication Productivity among Academic Scientists in Doctoral-Granting Departments , 2007 .

[26]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Using the Curriculum Vita to Study the Career Paths of Scientists and Engineers: An Exploratory Assessment , 2004, Scientometrics.

[27]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[29]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[30]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000 , 2005 .

[31]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[32]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[34]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  A. G. Heffner,et al.  Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines , 2005, Scientometrics.

[36]  C. Autant‐Bernard,et al.  Social distance versus spatial distance in R & D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[37]  Halla Thorsteinsdóttir,et al.  External Research Collaboration in Two Small Science Systems , 2000, Scientometrics.

[38]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[39]  Heike Jons,et al.  ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: studying long‐term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000 , 2009 .

[40]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[41]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[43]  R. Braddock,et al.  International University Ranking Systems and the Idea of University Excellence , 2007 .

[44]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  All in a Day'S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions , 2000 .

[45]  Luca Grilli,et al.  Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view , 2005 .

[46]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[47]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[48]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[49]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[50]  Wolfgang Glänzel Peter Vinkler and Michel Zitt win the 2009 Derek John de Solla Price Medal , 2009 .

[51]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[52]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers , 2008 .

[53]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[54]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[55]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations , 2005, Scientometrics.

[56]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research , 2003, Scientometrics.

[57]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[58]  Diana Crane,et al.  Transnational Networks in Basic Science , 1971, International Organization.

[59]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[60]  Francis Narin,et al.  Globalization of Research, Scholarly Information, and Patents–Ten Year Trends , 1991 .

[61]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[62]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.