Evaluation of the efficacy of peer-learning method in nutrition students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Introduction: One of notable initiatives in improving the academic education is to use the abilities of students to learn together in a new and effective system of peer learning. In this regard, Education Development Center in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences proceed to implementation and study of the curriculum and teaching methods course in the form of peer learning for college students of nutrition science and survey the efficacy of this implementation. Methods: This study was conducted two parts: qualitative and quantitative survey. A quasi-experimental, pre test/post-test research was used in quantitative part. In this study, whole groups of undergraduate nutrition students in courses of study and learning techniques with the help of teachers held a course and took a part in a competition in 15 major subjects of study and learning methods. The study lasted for two-week sessions and whole of nutrition students were included. We used pair t test for comparison pre test and post test in this study. Results: In the quantitative part of the study, the results showed a significant difference between pre-test (0.0346±0.108) and post-test scores (0.809±0.187) of the students. This means that the level of knowledge of students, who participated in this course, has significant difference before and after the peer learning course (pair t-test=1.010, p=0.002). The results of the quality survey of the training course also indicated satisfaction of participants and necessity of teacher’s presence and control at courses. Conclusions: The results of this study confirm the results of the previous studies emphasizing numerous positive effects of the peer learning methods in the academic community. The results also suggest that peer learning is effective to enhancement of the students' confidence and learning. Peer learning also helps to develop their future responsibilities.

[1]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. , 2003 .

[2]  P. Cantillon,et al.  Helping each other to learn – a process evaluation of peer assisted learning , 2006, BMC medical education.

[3]  Erin M Thomas,et al.  Clinical skills education: outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers, and simulated patients. , 2009 .

[4]  F. Lake,et al.  Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students , 2012, Medical teacher.

[5]  Adrienne J Lindblad,et al.  Development and evaluation of a student pharmacist clinical teaching unit utilizing peer-assisted learning. , 2011, The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy.

[6]  J. Wong,et al.  Formal Peer-Teaching in Medical School Improves Academic Performance: The MUSC Supplemental Instructor Program , 2007, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[7]  B. Manning.  Cognitive Self-Instruction for Classroom Processes , 1991 .

[8]  J. Zamora,et al.  Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching , 2007, BMC medical education.

[9]  D. Nestel,et al.  Peer tutoring in patient-centred interviewing skills: experience of a project for first-year students , 2003, Medical teacher.

[10]  A. Wadoodi,et al.  Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited , 2002, Medical teacher.

[11]  K. Arrow.  Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[12]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for First-Grade Readers: Responding to the Needs of Diverse Learners. , 1998 .

[13]  Barbara Pfeffer,et al.  Peer Teaching To Teach Is To Learn Twice , 2016 .

[14]  Jacinta Secomb,et al.  A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[15]  Dejano T Sobral,et al.  Cross‐year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors , 2002, Medical education.

[16]  K. Topping.  The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature , 1996 .

[17]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other , 2014 .

[18]  S. Carmichael,et al.  Reciprocal peer teaching: Students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  L. Stewart,et al.  Peer learning partnership: an innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. , 2006, Nurse education today.

[20]  W. Kernan,et al.  Student faculty rounds: a peer-mediated learning activity for internal medicine clerkships , 2005, Medical teacher.

[21]  Aytaç Göğüş.  Peer learning and assessment , 2012 .

[22]  H. L. Lipton,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Interprofessional Health Policy Education for Medicare Part D , 2010, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[23]  Z. Vanaki,et al.  THE EFFECT OF GUIDED RECIPROCAL PEER QUESTIONING (GRPQ) ON NURSING STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING AND ME-TACOGNITION SKILLS , 2009 .

[24]  A. Tonkin,et al.  Clinical skills education: outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients , 2008, Medical education.

[25]  Neal Whitman,et al.  Peer Teaching: To Teach Is to Learn Twice , 1988 .

[26]  H. Cameron,et al.  Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no. 30 , 2007, Medical teacher.

[27]  M. Field,et al.  Peer‐assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students , 2007, Medical education.

[28]  Melissa C. Marty,et al.  Peer Assisted Learning in Clinical Education: Literature Review , 2008 .

[29]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Learning in the Simulated Setting: A Comparison of Expert-, Peer-, and Computer-Assisted Learning , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.