Effect of Dimensionality on the Photocatalytic Behavior of Carbon-Titania Nanosheet Composites: Charge Transfer at Nanomaterial Interfaces.

Due to their unique optoelectronic structure and large specific surface area, carbon nanomaterials have been integrated with titania to enhance photocatalysis. In particular, recent work has shown that nanocomposite photocatalytic performance can be improved by minimizing the covalent defect density of the carbon component. Herein, carbon nanotube-titania nanosheet and graphene-titania nanosheet composites with low carbon defect densities are compared to investigate the role of carbon nanomaterial dimensionality on photocatalytic response. The resulting 2D-2D graphene-titania nanosheet composites yield superior electronic coupling compared to 1D-2D carbon nanotube-titania nanosheet composites, leading to greater enhancement factors for CO2 photoreduction under ultraviolet irradiation. On the other hand, 1D carbon nanotubes are shown to be more effective titania photosensitizers, leading to greater photoactivity enhancement factors under visible illumination. Overall, this work suggests that carbon nanomaterial dimensionality is a key factor in determining the spectral response and reaction specificity of carbon-titania nanosheet composite photocatalysts.

[1]  Xianzhi Fu,et al.  TiO2-graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: is TiO2-graphene truly different from other TiO2-carbon composite materials? , 2010, ACS nano.

[2]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Large area mosaic films of graphene-titania: self-assembly at the liquid-air interface and photo-responsive behavior. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[3]  Philippe Guyot-Sionnest,et al.  Electrochromic nanocrystal quantum dots. , 2001, Science.

[4]  Yueming Li,et al.  P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. , 2010, ACS nano.

[5]  M. Hersam,et al.  Catalytically active nanocomposites of electronically coupled carbon nanotubes and platinum nanoparticles formed via vacuum filtration , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[6]  P. Kamat.  Graphene-Based Nanoassemblies for Energy Conversion , 2011 .

[7]  M. Hersam,et al.  Highly concentrated graphene solutions via polymer enhanced solvent exfoliation and iterative solvent exchange. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Jesse M. Kinder,et al.  Nonradiative Recombination of Excitons in Carbon Nanotubes Mediated by Free Charge Carriers , 2008, 0808.0737.

[9]  Bernadette A. Hernandez-Sanchez,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Titania-Graphene Nanocomposites. , 2009 .

[10]  P. Kamat,et al.  TiO2-graphene nanocomposites. UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide. , 2008, ACS nano.

[11]  C. Grimes,et al.  and Water Vapor to Hydrocarbon Fuels , 2009 .

[12]  Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin,et al.  Fabrication of screen‐printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye‐sensitised solar cells , 2007 .

[13]  K. Shepard,et al.  Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  P. Kamat.  Graphene‐Based Nanoarchitectures. Anchoring Semiconductor and Metal Nanoparticles on a Two‐Dimensional Carbon Support , 2010 .

[15]  Xiaoqiang An,et al.  Graphene-based photocatalytic composites , 2011 .

[16]  Phaedon Avouris,et al.  Thin film nanotube transistors based on self-assembled, aligned, semiconducting carbon nanotube arrays. , 2008, ACS nano.

[17]  M. Jaroniec,et al.  Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. , 2012, Chemical Society Reviews.

[18]  C. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  100 GHz Transistors from Wafer Scale Epitaxial Graphene , 2010, 1002.3845.

[19]  Xianzhi Fu,et al.  Engineering the unique 2D mat of graphene to achieve graphene-TiO2 nanocomposite for photocatalytic selective transformation: what advantage does graphene have over its forebear carbon nanotube? , 2011, ACS nano.

[20]  Y. Wada,et al.  Enhancement of Photoexcited Charge Transfer by {001} Facet-Dominating TiO2 Nanoparticles , 2011 .

[21]  Zhaoxiong Xie,et al.  Synthesis of titania nanosheets with a high percentage of exposed (001) facets and related photocatalytic properties. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Jin Zou,et al.  Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets , 2008, Nature.

[23]  A. Alivisatos,et al.  Colloidal Nanocrystal Shape and Size Control: The Case of Cobalt , 2001, Science.

[24]  J. Tour,et al.  Covalent chemistry of single-wall carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[25]  J. Nedeljković,et al.  Photoluminescence of anatase and rutile TiO2 particles. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  W. Sigmund,et al.  Photocatalytic Carbon‐Nanotube–TiO2 Composites , 2009 .

[27]  M. Jaroniec,et al.  Enhanced photocatalytic H₂-production activity of graphene-modified titania nanosheets. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[28]  Jiaguo Yu,et al.  Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 aggregates by embedding carbon nanotubes as electron-transfer channel. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[29]  L. Lauhon,et al.  A synergistic assembly of nanoscale lamellar photoconductor hybrids. , 2009, Nature materials.

[30]  Mietek Jaroniec,et al.  Synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Mark C Hersam,et al.  Minimizing graphene defects enhances titania nanocomposite-based photocatalytic reduction of CO2 for improved solar fuel production. , 2011, Nano letters.

[32]  Peidong Yang,et al.  Shape Control of Colloidal Metal Nanocrystals , 2008 .

[33]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Photoreactive TiO2/carbon nanotube composites: synthesis and reactivity. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  P. Ajayan,et al.  Graphene: pushing the boundaries. , 2011, Nature materials.

[35]  M. Hersam.  Progress towards monodisperse single-walled carbon nanotubes. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[36]  Jianqiang Yu,et al.  Synthesis of Self-Organized Polycrystalline F-doped TiO2 Hollow Microspheres and Their Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light , 2008 .

[37]  Sean C. Smith,et al.  Hybrid Graphene/Titania Nanocomposite: Interface Charge Transfer, Hole Doping, and Sensitization for Visible Light Response. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[38]  Nan Zhang,et al.  Improving the photocatalytic performance of graphene-TiO2 nanocomposites via a combined strategy of decreasing defects of graphene and increasing interfacial contact. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[39]  P. Kamat,et al.  To What Extent Do Graphene Scaffolds Improve the Photovoltaic and Photocatalytic Response of TiO2 Nanostructured Films , 2010 .

[40]  M. Hersam,et al.  Towards Rationally Designed Graphene‐Based Materials and Devices , 2012 .

[41]  Mark C Hersam,et al.  Emerging Methods for Producing Monodisperse Graphene Dispersions. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry letters.