The Contribution of Amplitude Envelope Cues to Sentence Identification in Young and Aged Listeners

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification for aged listeners. We also examined the effect of increasing alterations (i.e., compression ratio) and amount of available frequency content (i.e., number of channels) for this population. Design Thirty-six listeners were classified according to their age (35 or younger versus 65 and older) and hearing status (normal hearing versus hearing impaired). Within each hearing status, mean hearing threshold thresholds for the young and aged listeners were matched as closely as possible through 4 kHz to control for sensitivity differences across age, and all listeners passed a cognitive screening battery. Accuracy of synthetic sentence identification was measured using stimuli processed to restrict spectral information. Performance was measured as a function of age, hearing status, amount of spectral information, and degradation of the amplitude envelope (using fast-acting compression with compression ratios ranging from 1:1 to 5:1). Results Mean identification scores decreased significantly with increasing age, the presence of hearing loss, the removal of spectral information, and with increasing distortion of the amplitude envelope (i.e., higher compression ratios). There was a consistent performance gap between young and aged listeners, regardless of the magnitude of change to the amplitude envelope. This suggests that some cue other than amplitude envelope variations is inaccessible to the aged listeners. Conclusions Although aged listeners performed more poorly overall, they did not show greater susceptibility to alterations in amplitude-envelope cues, such as those produced by fast-acting amplitude compression systems. It is therefore unlikely that compression parameters such as attack and release time or compression ratio would need to be differentially programmed for aged listeners. Instead, the data suggest two possibilities: aged listeners have difficulty accessing the fine-structure temporal cues present in speech, and/or performance is degraded by age-related loss of function at a central processing level.

[1]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  J. Jerger,et al.  Factor analytic structure of auditory impairment in elderly persons. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[3]  C W Turner,et al.  Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  A Faulkner,et al.  Voicing, fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope and voiceless excitation as cues to consonant identity , 1994 .

[5]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[6]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C W Turner,et al.  Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  R Drullman,et al.  Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Miller,et al.  Auditory dysfunction in aging and senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[10]  J. Cerella Aging and Information-Processing Rate , 1990 .

[11]  R G Matschke,et al.  Frequency selectivity and psychoacoustic tuning curves in old age. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[12]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H J Simon,et al.  Perception of temporal differences in speech by "normal-hearing" adults: effects of age and intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[15]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of the fitting parameters of a two-channel compression system on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[16]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. , 1996, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[17]  C. J. Hardiman,et al.  Central auditory processing in normal-hearing elderly adults. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  R. Freyman,et al.  Consonant confusions in amplitude-expanded speech. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  P E Souza,et al.  Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  M F Dorman,et al.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  G. Clark,et al.  Aided speech recognition abilities of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.

[24]  C. Turner,et al.  Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[25]  P E Souza Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  J. Jerger Can age-related decline in speech understanding be explained by peripheral hearing loss? , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  P E Souza,et al.  Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[29]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Mills,et al.  Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  Effects of electrode montage on the spectral composition of the infant auditory brainstem response. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[32]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Phoneme perception via hearing aids with and without compression and the role of temporal resolution. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[34]  L. Humes,et al.  The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  C Speaks,et al.  A new approach to speech audiometry. , 1968, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[36]  L. Humes Speech understanding in the elderly. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  H. Dillon,et al.  Compression in hearing aids: an analysis, a review and some recommendations , 1981 .

[38]  C W Turner,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[39]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  K. Grant,et al.  Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.