Integrating system analysis and project management tools

Abstract Currently, computer-aided tools for system analysis are distinct from project management tools. This study proposes and prototypes a model that integrates these two aspects of the Information System Life Cycle (ISLC) by automatically mapping system analysis objects into project management objects. To validate the feasibility of our model and without loss of generality, the conversion of Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) objects into Gantt and Pert diagrams is demonstrated in this study. Experiments with the prototype confirm that integrating common tools for system analysis and standard tools for project management, during system development, helps improve system building tasks and their management. In addition, project managers using the proposed mapping approach can better assess project duration and system performance parameters such as response time and data traffic. We address implications of our work to both academics and practitioners, discussing directions future research might take as well as opportunities and prospects for commercialization of the proposed approach.

[1]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Software engineering (5th ed.) , 1995 .

[2]  Karlheinz Kautz Making Sense of Measurement for Small Organizations , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[3]  Robert B. Angus,et al.  Planning, Performing, and Controlling Projects: Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[4]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[5]  Suzanne Robertson,et al.  Mastering the Requirements Process , 1999 .

[6]  Soumitra Dutta,et al.  Software Engineering in Europe: A Study of Best Practices , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[7]  Anita D. Carleton,et al.  Case studies of software-process-improvement measurement , 1994, Computer.

[8]  Matthias Jarke Scenarios for Modelling. , 1999 .

[9]  Edward F. Weller Using metrics to manage software projects , 1994, Computer.

[10]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  Project Management Software Usage Patterns and Suggested Research Directions for Future Developments , 1998 .

[11]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  Aligning Strategic and Project Measurement Systems , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[12]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement , 1992 .

[13]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Information system project-selection criteria variations within strategic classes , 1999 .

[14]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Embedding formal knowledge models in active documents , 1999, CACM.

[15]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Principles of Software Engineering Management by Tom Gilb with Susannah Pinzi, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK, 442 pages (incl. index) (£17.95) , 1989, Robotica (Cambridge. Print).

[16]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Adapting traceability environments to project-specific needs , 1998, CACM.

[17]  J. Wayne Spence,et al.  Tools of the Trade: A Survey of Project Management Tools , 1998 .

[18]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Capturing the Benefits of Requirements Engineering , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[19]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Successfully applying software metrics , 1994, Computer.

[20]  Richard Barker,et al.  Case*Method: Function and Process Modelling , 1992 .

[21]  Barbara A. Kitchenham,et al.  A Method for Software Quality Planning, Control, and Evaluation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[22]  J.S. Reel,et al.  Critical Success Factors in Software Projects , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[23]  M. Zviran,et al.  Top management toolbox for managing corporate IT , 1999, CACM.

[24]  Hermann Kaindl,et al.  Symbolic modeling in practice , 1999, CACM.