Why girls say 'holded' more than boys.

Women are better than men at verbal memory tasks, such as remembering word lists. These tasks depend on declarative memory. The declarative/procedural model of language, which posits that the lexicon of stored words is part of declarative memory, while grammatical composition of complex forms depends on procedural memory, predicts a female superiority in aspects of lexical memory. Other neurocognitive models of language have not made this prediction. Here we examine the prediction in past-tense over-regularizations (e.g. holded) produced by children. We expected that girls would remember irregular past-tense forms (held) better than boys, and thus would over-regularize less. To our surprise, girls over-regularized far more than boys. We investigated potential explanations for this sex difference. Analyses showed that in girls but not boys, over-regularization rates correlated with measures of the number of similar-sounding regulars (folded, molded). This sex difference in phonological neighborhood effects is taken to suggest that girls tend to produce over-regularizations in associative lexical memory, generalizing over stored neighboring regulars, while boys are more likely to depend upon rule-governed affixation (hold+-ed). The finding is consistent with the hypothesis that, likely due to their superior lexical abilities, females tend to retrieve from memory complex forms (walked) that men generally compose with the grammatical system (walk+-ed). The results suggest that sex may be an important factor in the acquisition and computation of language.

[1]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[2]  Lois Bloom,et al.  One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax , 1976 .

[3]  J. Bohannon,et al.  Children's control of adult speech. , 1977 .

[4]  C Snow,et al.  Child language data exchange system , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  R. Higginson Fixing : assimilation in language acquisition , 1985 .

[6]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[10]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  G. Goodman,et al.  Testifying in criminal court: emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[12]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[13]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[14]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns , 1993 .

[15]  V. Marchman,et al.  Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense , 1996, Cognition.

[16]  M J de Leon,et al.  Hippocampal formation size predicts declining memory performance in normal aging , 1996, Neurology.

[17]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Developmental sex differences in verbal learning. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[18]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  B. McEwen,et al.  Clinically relevant basic science studies of gender differences and sex hormone effects. , 1998, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[20]  C. Woolley,et al.  Hormonal Effects on the Brain , 1998, Epilepsia.

[21]  P. Gordon,et al.  Frequency Effects and the Representational Status of Regular Inflections , 1999 .

[22]  Christian Vollmar,et al.  Normative Volumetric Data of the Developing Hippocampus in Children Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, Epilepsia.

[23]  D. Kimura Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[24]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[26]  M. Ullman A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  M T Ullman,et al.  The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[28]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  M. Ullman Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[31]  Robbin A. Miranda,et al.  Sex Differences in the Neurocognition of Language , 2007 .

[32]  M. Ullman,et al.  Consecutive ERP effects of morpho-phonology and morpho-syntax , 2022 .