Site-Specific and Targeted Therapy Based on Molecular Profiling by Next-Generation Sequencing for Cancer of Unknown Primary Site: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Importance Although profiling of gene expression and gene alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to predict the primary tumor site and guide molecularly targeted therapy might be expected to improve clinical outcomes for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), to our knowledge, no clinical trial has previously evaluated this approach. Objective To assess the clinical use of site-specific treatment, including molecularly targeted therapy based on NGS results, for patients with CUP. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 19 institutions in Japan and enrolled 111 previously untreated patients with the unfavorable subset of CUP between March 2015 and January 2018, with 97 patients being included in the efficacy analysis. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of unfavorable CUP after mandatory examinations, including pathological evaluation by immunohistochemistry, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography scans, and a positron emission tomography scan. Interventions RNA and DNA sequencing for selected genes was performed simultaneously to evaluate gene expression and gene alterations, respectively. A newly established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin based on these data. Patients received site-specific therapy, including molecularly targeted therapy, according to the predicted site and detected gene alterations. Main Outcomes And Measures The primary end point was 1-year survival probability. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, safety, efficacy according to predicted site, and frequency of gene alterations. Results Of 97 participants, 49 (50.5%) were women and the median (range) age was 64 (21-81) years. The cancer types most commonly predicted were lung (21 [21%]), liver (15 [15%]), kidney (15 [15%]), and colorectal (12 [12%]) cancer. The most frequent gene alterations were in TP53 (45 [46.4%]), KRAS (19 [19.6%]), and CDKN2A (18 [18.6%]). The 1-year survival probability, median OS, and median PFS were 53.1% (95% CI, 42.6%-62.5%), 13.7 months (95% CI, 9.3-19.7 months), and 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.3-7.1 months), respectively. Targetable EGFR mutations in tumor specimens were detected in 5 patients with predicted non-small-cell lung cancer (5.2%), 4 of whom were treated with afatinib; 2 of these patients achieved a durable PFS of longer than 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance This study's findings suggest that site-specific treatment, including molecularly targeted therapy based on profiling gene expression and gene alterations by NGS, can contribute to treating patients with the unfavorable subset of CUP. Trial Registration UMIN Identifier: UMIN000016794.

[1]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era , 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Azmi,et al.  KRAS G12C Game of Thrones, which direct KRAS inhibitor will claim the iron throne? , 2020, Cancer treatment reviews.

[3]  S. Tomida,et al.  Clinical and immune profiling for cancer of unknown primary site , 2019, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[4]  H. Mukai,et al.  Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Site-Specific Treatment Based on Gene Expression Profiling With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  S. Vicent,et al.  KRAS oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer: clinical perspectives on the treatment of an old target , 2018, Molecular Cancer.

[6]  N. Schultz,et al.  Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with cancer of unknown primary in the modern era , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  A. Drilon,et al.  Safety and Antitumor Activity of the Multitargeted Pan-TRK, ROS1, and ALK Inhibitor Entrectinib: Combined Results from Two Phase I Trials (ALKA-372-001 and STARTRK-1). , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[8]  R. Tothill,et al.  Epigenetic profiling to classify cancer of unknown primary: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  F. Sinicrope,et al.  Molecular Biomarkers in the Personalized Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. , 2016, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[10]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Clinical application of amplicon-based next-generation sequencing to therapeutic decision making in lung cancer. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  J. Blay,et al.  Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  George Pentheroudakis,et al.  Cancer of Unknown Primary origin in the genomic era: Elucidating the dark box of cancer. , 2015, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without belinostat as empiric first‐line treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: A randomized, phase 2 trial , 2015, Cancer.

[14]  Kai Wang,et al.  Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: New Routes to Targeted Therapies. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[15]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  A mini review on cancer of unknown primary site: A clinical puzzle for the oncologists , 2014, Journal of advanced research.

[16]  G. Varadhachary,et al.  Cancer of unknown primary site. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  George Pentheroudakis,et al.  Prognostication in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): development of a prognostic algorithm in 311 cases and review of the literature. , 2013, Cancer treatment reviews.

[18]  Joshua L. Deignan,et al.  ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[19]  R. Aharonov,et al.  Novel microRNA-based assay demonstrates 92% agreement with diagnosis based on clinicopathologic and management data in a cohort of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary , 2013, Molecular Cancer.

[20]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Molecular profiling diagnosis in unknown primary cancer: accuracy and ability to complement standard pathology. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  G. Varadhachary New Strategies for Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: The Role of Tissue-of-Origin Molecular Profiling , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah Cannon research institute. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  R. Aharonov,et al.  A Second-Generation MicroRNA-Based Assay for Diagnosing Tumor Tissue Origin , 2012 .

[24]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Cancer of unknown primary site , 2012, The Lancet.

[25]  Christophe Massard,et al.  Carcinomas of an unknown primary origin—diagnosis and treatment , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[26]  R. Salunga,et al.  Performance and clinical evaluation of the 92-gene real-time PCR assay for tumor classification. , 2011, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[27]  R. Aharonov,et al.  Prospective Gene Signature Study Using microRNA to Identify the Tissue of Origin in Patients with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide Versus Gemcitabine/Irinotecan in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Randomized, Phase III Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium Trial , 2010, Cancer journal.

[30]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Molecular assignment of tissue of origin in cancer of unknown primary may not predict response to therapy or outcome: a systematic literature review. , 2009, Cancer treatment reviews.

[31]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Treatment for patients with unknown primary carcinoma and unfavorable prognostic factors. , 2009, Seminars in oncology.

[32]  Howard,et al.  Carcinoma of unknown primary site: sequential treatment with paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide and gemcitabine/irinotecan: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial. , 2004, The oncologist.

[33]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network study. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in unknown primary carcinoma: a phase II Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Carcinoma of unknown primary site: phase II trials with docetaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.