PCRLB-based sensor selection for maneuvering target tracking in range-based sensor networks

Recent years have witnessed the shift of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) from theoretical research to practical applications. Due to their simplicity, range-based sensor networks have been widely used. To track a maneuvering target in range-based sensor networks, first, we derive the relationship between the multiple model posterior Cramer-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) and the distance from the sensor to the target, which forms the basis of choosing the subset of candidate sensors that may attend the incoming tracking event. Second, we design two optimization strategies under the communication constraint, namely the optimal sensor selection and cluster head selection. Third, we can estimate the state of the maneuvering target by making use of the interacting multiple model (IMM) algorithm and predict the model index one time step ahead. Last, simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed schemes.

[1]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[3]  Hing Cheung So,et al.  SENSOR SELECTION FOR TARGET TRACKING IN SENSOR NETWORKS , 2009 .

[4]  V. Jilkov,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V. Multiple-model methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  A. Farina,et al.  Performance measure for Markovian switching systems using best-fitting Gaussian distributions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Networked sensor management and data rate control for tracking maneuvering targets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Large-Scale Optimal Sensor Array Management for Multitarget Tracking , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  Jiming Peng,et al.  Optimization-Based Dynamic Sensor Management for Distributed Multitarget Tracking , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  Amir Averbuch,et al.  Interacting Multiple Model Methods in Target Tracking: A Survey , 1988 .

[10]  Venkatesh Saligrama,et al.  Efficient Sensor Management Policies for Distributed Target Tracking in Multihop Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Abhijit Sinha,et al.  PCRLB-based multisensor array management for multitarget tracking , 2007 .

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Using covariance intersection for SLAM , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming for Communication-Constrained Sensor Network Management , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Xiaodong Wang,et al.  Dynamic sensor collaboration via sequential Monte Carlo , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Marco Tomassini,et al.  Injecting power-awareness into epidemic information dissemination in sensor networks , 2010, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  Lennart Svensson Evaluating the Bayesian Cramér-Rao Bound for multiple model filtering , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  R.L. Moses,et al.  Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multisensor resource deployment using posterior Cramer-Rao bounds , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  W. Niehsen,et al.  Information fusion based on fast covariance intersection filtering , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[21]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Balancing energy consumption with mobile agents in wireless sensor networks , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..