Interceptor and trim tab combination to prevent interceptor's unfit effects

Abstract Trim tabs, small surfaces connected to the end of the craft to control the trim by adjusting the angle of tab, relative to the larger surface, have been used to optimize the running trim of displacement, semi-planning, and planning vessels for many years. Interceptors are the same as trim tabs, but are vertically installed at the end of the craft to control the trim by changing the height. As demonstrated in this paper, the same size as the interceptor and trim tab (when span and chord of trim tab are respectively equal to span and height of interceptor), the interceptor shows better efficiency (better trim and resistance reduction). While efficiency of trim tab just depends on the trim tab angle, the effective factors on the interceptor effectiveness are little complicated. The interceptor efficiency highly depends on the interceptor height and boundary layer thickness at transom. Although the higher interceptor increases the amount of lift force, but that could create a very strong moment against trim moment and consequently negative trim angle. The results of this investigation prove that the combination of an interceptor with a trim tab shows better performance compared to an interceptor or a trim tab. Also instead of increasing the interceptor height to gain more lift, which could make intense negative trim, it is better to use integrated interceptor with trim tab. To do so, a comprehensive series of dynamic CFD simulations have been performed in the case of a simple planning boat model with three different trim control appendages. Unsteady Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes equations (URANS) are applied to model the flow around the considered model with interceptor, trim tab and combination of an interceptor and a trim tab at an equal span length. The model is analyzed based on finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm using dynamic meshes in the Fluent computational code. For validation of the CFD results, the Savitsky planning boat calculations (only for model boat) and the grid convergence index (GCI) were used to estimate the uncertainties due to grid-spacing and time-step.

[1]  Daniel Savitsky,et al.  PROCEDURES FOR HYDRODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF PLANING HULLS IN SMOOTH AND ROUGH WATER , 1975 .

[2]  Ali Bakhshandeh Rostami,et al.  Adaptive viscous–inviscid interaction method for analysis of airfoils in ground effect , 2016 .

[3]  Hassan Ghassemi,et al.  Interceptor hydrodynamic analysis for handling trim control problems in the high-speed crafts , 2011 .

[4]  Handa Xi,et al.  Feedback Stabilization of High-Speed Planing Vessels by a Controllable Transom Flap , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  AIAA COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS: STATUS AND PLANS , 2004 .

[6]  Mahmoud Mani,et al.  A Multizone Moving Mesh Algorithm for Simulation of Flow Around a Rigid Body With Arbitrary Motion , 2006 .

[7]  Antonio Carlos Fernandes,et al.  The interceptor hydrodynamic analysis for controlling the porpoising instability in high speed crafts , 2016 .

[8]  R. I. Issa,et al.  A Method for Capturing Sharp Fluid Interfaces on Arbitrary Meshes , 1999 .

[9]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation. , 2005 .

[10]  J.F. Tsai,et al.  Study on the compound effects of interceptor with stern flap for two fast monohulls , 2004, Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600).

[11]  Srikanth Syamsundar,et al.  Performance prediction of high-speed planing craft with interceptors using a variation of the savitsky method , 2008 .

[12]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[13]  A. C. Fernandes,et al.  Hydrodynamics of the interceptor on a 2-D flat plate by CFD and experiments , 2015 .

[14]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[15]  Jeroen Gerrits Dynamics of liquid-filled spacecraft: numerical simulation of coupled solid-liquid dynamics , 2001 .

[16]  Gabor Karafiath,et al.  THE EFFECT OF STERN WEDGES ON SHIP POWERING PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[17]  Hamid Zeraatgar,et al.  A study on performance of planing-wing hybrid craft , 2012 .

[18]  Toru Katayama,et al.  STABILITY OF HIGH SPEED CRAFT , 2000 .

[19]  Leonardo C. Scalabrin,et al.  Numerical simulations of three-dimensional flow over a multi-stage rocket using finite volumes , 2015, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering.

[20]  Antonio Carlos Fernandes,et al.  Hydrodynamics of the Interceptor Analysis Via Both Ultrareduced Model Test and Dynamic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation , 2017 .

[21]  Ali Bakhshandeh Rostami,et al.  Aerodynamic analysis of the boundary layer region of symmetric airfoils at ground proximity , 2012 .