A hybrid decision support model to discover informative knowledge in diagnosing acute appendicitis

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to develop a simple and reliable hybrid decision support model by combining statistical analysis and decision tree algorithms to ensure high accuracy of early diagnosis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and to identify useful decision rules.MethodsWe enrolled 326 patients who attended an emergency medical center complaining mainly of acute abdominal pain. Statistical analysis approaches were used as a feature selection process in the design of decision support models, including the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.01), and Wald forward logistic regression (entry and removal criteria of 0.01 and 0.05, or 0.05 and 0.10, respectively). The final decision support models were constructed using the C5.0 decision tree algorithm of Clementine 12.0 after pre-processing.ResultsOf 55 variables, two subsets were found to be indispensable for early diagnostic knowledge discovery in acute appendicitis. The two subsets were as follows: (1) lymphocytes, urine glucose, total bilirubin, total amylase, chloride, red blood cell, neutrophils, eosinophils, white blood cell, complaints, basophils, glucose, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, urine ketone, and direct bilirubin in the univariate analysis-based model; and (2) neutrophils, complaints, total bilirubin, urine glucose, and lipase in the multivariate analysis-based model. The experimental results showed that the model with univariate analysis (80.2%, 82.4%, 78.3%, 76.8%, 83.5%, and 80.3%) outperformed models using multivariate analysis (71.6%, 69.3%, 73.7%, 69.7%, 73.3%, and 71.5% with entry and removal criteria of 0.01 and 0.05; 73.5%, 66.0%, 80.0%, 74.3%, 72.9%, and 73.0% with entry and removal criteria of 0.05 and 0.10) in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under ROC curve, during a 10-fold cross validation. A statistically significant difference was detected in the pairwise comparison of ROC curves (p < 0.01, 95% CI, 3.13-14.5; p < 0.05, 95% CI, 1.54-13.1). The larger induced decision model was more effective for identifying acute appendicitis in patients with acute abdominal pain, whereas the smaller induced decision tree was less accurate with the test data.ConclusionsThe decision model developed in this study can be applied as an aid in the initial decision making of clinicians to increase vigilance in cases of suspected acute appendicitis.

[1]  P. Deas Notes of a Case of Spontaneous Fracture of the Humerus and Femur, Resulting from Degeneration of the Bones , 1877, British medical journal.

[2]  Y. Hong,et al.  Macroamylasemia in a patient with acute appendicitis: a case report. , 1999, Journal of Korean medical science.

[3]  P. Näsman,et al.  Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy. , 1982, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[4]  K. Aravindan,et al.  Evidence for eosinophil degranulation in acute appendicitis. , 2008, Indian journal of pathology & microbiology.

[5]  M Juhola,et al.  Parameters for a Knowledge Base for Acute Appendicitis , 1994, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[7]  Horng-ren Yang,et al.  Role of Leukocyte Count, Neutrophil Percentage, and C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly , 2005, The American surgeon.

[8]  Huan Liu,et al.  Feature Selection for Classification , 1997, Intell. Data Anal..

[9]  Jih-Chang Chen,et al.  RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PERFORATED APPENDICITIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.

[10]  Shih-Hua Lin,et al.  Neural network modeling to stratify peritoneal membrane transporter in predialytic patients. , 2006, Internal medicine.

[11]  S. Rothrock,et al.  Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  R. Andersson Artificial Neural Networks: Useful Aid in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[13]  Zhihua Chen,et al.  Using Prior Knowledge and Rule Induction Methods to Discover Molecular Markers of Prognosis in Lung Cancer , 2005, AMIA.

[14]  Hung-Wen Chiu,et al.  Application of an Artificial Neural Network to Predict Postinduction Hypotension During General Anesthesia , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  N. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. , 1995, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[16]  Irene Pala,et al.  BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[17]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network paradigm comparisons for appendicitis diagnoses , 1991, [1991] Computer-Based Medical Systems@m_Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE Symposium.

[18]  M Juhola,et al.  Comparison of different neural network algorithms in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 1996, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[19]  M. Fathi-Torbaghan,et al.  MEDUSA: A Fuzzy Expert System for Medical Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain , 1994, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[20]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Fuzzy-Rough Sets Assisted Attribute Selection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[21]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  N. Tzanakis,et al.  A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[23]  I. Adams,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. , 1986, British medical journal.

[24]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Has Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis Decreased Over Time , 2001 .

[25]  D. G. Swain Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain , 1986 .

[26]  Konrad Lang,et al.  Evaluation of automatic knowledge acquisition techniques in the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain - Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group , 1996, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[27]  Lena Gaga,et al.  ID+: Enhancing Medical Knowledge Acquisition with Machine Learning , 1996, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[28]  Chien-Lung Chan,et al.  Decision Model for Acute Appendicitis Treatment With Decision Tree Technology—A Modification of the Alvarado Scoring System , 2010, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[29]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[31]  D. Flum,et al.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[32]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[33]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .

[34]  A Alvarado,et al.  A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 1986, Annals of emergency medicine.

[35]  A. Nager,et al.  Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis: usefulness of laboratory markers. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[36]  Peter Kokol,et al.  Comparison of Three Databases with a Decision Tree Approach in the Medical Field of Acute Appendicitis , 2001, MedInfo.

[37]  Paul John Clark Utility of eosinophilia as a diagnostic clue in lower abdominal pain in northern Australia: a retrospective case–control study , 2008, Internal medicine journal.

[38]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[39]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Enhancing the effectiveness and interpretability of decision tree and rule induction classifiers with evolutionary training set selection over imbalanced problems , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..