Ecosystem Impairment Evaluation on Biodiversity and Functional Diversity for Contaminated Soil Assessment

Abstract A site-specific ecological risk assessment procedure for a qualitative evaluation of impairment occurring at the ecosystem level, as a result of soil contamination, was developed to integrate and visualize impairment in both terrestrial biodiversity and functional diversity and to support the decision maker in the contaminated site assessment. An Ecosystem Impairment Matrix (EcoIM) was proposed to identify the relationships between the applied measurement endpoints and the taxonomic groups living in the terrestrial system and between these taxonomic groups and the fundamental ecological processes. A specific impairment analysis procedure that used expert judgment allowed for the linking of impairment highlighted by the measurement endpoints with the terrestrial ecosystem's structure and functionality. Impairment occurring on each ecological element (i.e., biodiversity aspects and ecological functions and processes) was visualized by colored cells—1 for each relationship among measurement endpoint, taxonomic group, and ecological element—to support the expert in the ecosystem impairment evaluation. These results were then reported by the expert into the Global Ecosystem Impairment Evaluation Matrix (GEM) to summarize the obtained information and formulate a final judgment on ecosystem quality status. EcoIM and GEM were implemented in Module 2 of the decision support system DSS-ERAMANIA and are presented in this paper. The tools have been preliminarily applied to the Acna di Cengio (Italy) contaminated site; the results of this application are also presented and discussed.

[1]  Michiel Rutgers,et al.  Development of a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment for contaminated sites: part II. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of bioavailability assessment tools. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Elena Semenzin,et al.  DSS-ERAMANIA: Decision Support System for Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites , 2009 .

[3]  Jörg Römbke,et al.  Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection. , 2005, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[4]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[5]  Silvia Torresan,et al.  Development of a site-specific ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites: part I. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of ecotoxicological tests and ecological observations. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  F. T.,et al.  Ökologie , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[7]  J. Drexhage.  Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment , 2002 .

[8]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial) , 1997 .

[9]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites , 2000 .

[10]  A. Galston.  Fundamentals of Ecology , 1972, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  Andreas P. Loibner,et al.  Environmental Toxicity Testing , 2005 .

[12]  P. Lavelle.  Faunal Activities and Soil Processes: Adaptive Strategies That Determine Ecosystem Function , 1997 .

[13]  Jouni Laakso,et al.  Sensitivity of Primary Production to Changes in the Architecture of Belowground Food Webs , 1999 .

[14]  Jörg Römbke,et al.  Ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection. , 2005, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[15]  V. Wolters,et al.  Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers , 1997 .

[16]  Timo Hamers,et al.  The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk , 2002 .

[17]  Michiel Rutgers,et al.  Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe. , 2005, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[18]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components , 2002 .

[19]  S. Nortcliff.  Standardisation of soil quality attributes , 2002 .

[20]  H.J.P. Eijsackers,et al.  Site-specific ecological risks: a basic approach to function-specific assessment of soil pollution , 2000 .

[21]  Michiel Rutgers,et al.  Integration of bioavailability, ecology and ecotoxicology by three lines of evidence into ecological risk indexes for contaminated soil assessment. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Michiel Rutgers,et al.  Approach to Legislation in a Global Context , 2009 .

[23]  BOTANiCAL Gazette,et al.  Handbook of Soil Science , 1933, Botanical Gazette.

[24]  Ruth N. Hull,et al.  Strategies to enhance environmental security in transition countries , 2007 .

[25]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  Sediment quality criteria from the sediment quality triad: An example , 1986 .

[26]  P. Lavelle,et al.  Soil Ecology , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[27]  Jörg Römbke,et al.  The ecological classification and assessment of soils. , 2005, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.