Analysis and characterization of the vertical accuracy of digital elevation models from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

[1] The first near-global high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) of the Earth has recently been released following the successful Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) of 2000. This data set will have applications in a wide range of fields and will be especially valuable in the Earth sciences. Prior to widespread dissemination and use, it is important to acquire knowledge regarding the accuracy characteristics. In this work a comprehensive analysis of the vertical errors present in the data set and the assessment of their effects on different hydrogeomorphic products is performed. In particular, the work consisted of (1) measuring the vertical accuracy of the data set in two areas with different topographic characteristics; (2) characterizing the error structure by comparing elevation residuals with terrain attributes; (3) assessing a wavelet-based filter for removing speckle; and (4) assessing the effects of vertical errors on hydrogeomorphic products and on slope stability modeling. The results indicate that in the two sites, relief has a strong effect on the vertical accuracy of the SRTM DEM. In the high-relief terrain, large errors and data voids are frequent, and their location is strongly influenced by topography, while in the low- to medium-relief site, errors are smaller, although the hilly terrain still produces an effect on the sign of the errors. Speckling generates deviations in the drainage network in one of the investigated areas, but the application of a wavelet filter proved to be an effective tool for removing vertical noise, although further fine tuning is necessary. Vertical errors cause differences in automatically extracted hydrogeomorphic products that range between 4 and 1090.

[1]  Paolo Gamba,et al.  Preparing an urban test site for SRTM data validation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Thierry Toutin,et al.  Impact of terrain slope and aspect on radargrammetric DEM accuracy , 2002 .

[3]  Paolo Zatelli,et al.  New GRASS modules for multiresolution analysis with wavelets , 2002 .

[4]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology , 1995 .

[5]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology , 1999 .

[6]  L. Benda,et al.  Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow , 1997 .

[7]  T. Dunne Formation and controls of channel networks , 1980 .

[8]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  The Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development Model (CHILD) , 2001 .

[9]  Dong Wei,et al.  Simultaneous Speckle Reduction and Data Compression using Best Wavelet Packet Bases with Applications to SAR based ATD/R , 1995 .

[10]  R. Bras,et al.  Scaling regimes of local slope versus contributing area in digital elevation models , 1995 .

[11]  S. C. Porter,et al.  Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet during the Last Glaciation , 1998, Quaternary Research.

[12]  Katumi Musiake,et al.  Spatial resolution sensitivity of catchment geomorphologic properties and the effect on hydrological simulation , 2001 .

[13]  Kevin Amaratunga,et al.  Wavelet triangulated irregular networks , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  David J. Harding,et al.  High-resolution lidar topography of the Puget Lowland, Washington - A bonanza for earth science , 2003 .

[15]  R. Bamler,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar interferometry , 1998 .

[16]  Theodore A. Endreny,et al.  Correction of errors in SPOT-Derived DEM's using GTOPO30 data , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Jay C. Bell,et al.  Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling , 2001 .

[18]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[19]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Regional test of a model for shallow landsliding , 1998 .

[20]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[21]  Richard Bamler,et al.  The SRTM Mission - A World-Wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR Interferometry in 11 Days , 1999 .

[22]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[23]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[24]  R. David,et al.  Landscape dissection and drainage area-slope thresholds , 1994 .

[25]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  An object-oriented framework for distributed hydrologic and geomorphic modeling using triangulated irregular networks , 2001 .

[26]  T. Farr,et al.  Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data , 2000 .

[27]  Gilbert Strang,et al.  Signal processing for everyone , 2000 .

[28]  D. Alsdorf,et al.  Two Preliminary SRTM DEMs Within the Amazon Basin , 2002 .

[29]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data , 1995 .

[30]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[31]  R. Hanssen Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Theodore A. Endreny,et al.  Satellite-derived digital elevation model accuracy : hydrogeomorphological analysis requirements , 2000 .

[33]  Kevin J. McMaster Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions , 2002 .

[34]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[35]  A. Al-Shuaibi,et al.  THE RIEMANN ZETA FUNCTION USED IN THE INVERSION OF THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM , 1998 .

[36]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[37]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[38]  Clyde R Greenwalt,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF ERROR THEORY AND CARTOGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS , 1962 .

[39]  P. Rosen,et al.  SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR INTERFEROMETRY TO MEASURE EARTH'S SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY AND ITS DEFORMATION , 2000 .

[40]  David T. Sandwell,et al.  Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar topography mission data , 2003 .

[41]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[42]  D. Montgomery,et al.  A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding , 1994 .

[43]  Derek B. Booth,et al.  Glaciofluvial infilling and scour of the Puget Lowland , 1994 .

[44]  Riley M. Duren,et al.  Metrology, attitude, and orbit determination for spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[45]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[46]  Christian Heipke,et al.  Analysis of SRTM DTM - Methodology and practical results * , 2002 .

[47]  Stephen Wise,et al.  Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours , 2000 .

[48]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Effects of Digital Elevation Model Accuracy on Hydrologic Predictions , 2000 .

[49]  D. Tarboton,et al.  Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data , 2001 .

[50]  H. Breit,et al.  The Global SRTM X-SAR DEM - Calibration, Validation, Production Status and Results , 2002 .