Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter

When stimulated with complex action potential sequences synapses exhibit spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) with modulated pre- and postsynaptic contributions to long-term synaptic modifications. In order to investigate the functional consequences of these contribution dynamics (CD) we propose a minimal model formulated in terms of differential equations. We find that our model reproduces data from to recent experimental studies with a small number of biophysically in-terpretable parameters. The model allows to investigate the susceptibility of STDP to arbitrary time courses of pre- and postsynaptic activities, i.e. its nonlinear filter properties. We demonstrate this for the simple example of small periodic modulations of pre- and postsynaptic firing rates for which our model can be solved. It predicts synaptic strengthening for synchronous rate modulations. Modifications are dominant in the theta frequency range, a result which underlines the well known relevance of theta activities in hippocampus and cortex for learning. We also find emphasis of specific baseline spike rates and suppression for high background rates. The latter suggests a mechanism of network activity regulation inherent in STDP. Furthermore, our novel formulation provides a general framework for investigating the joint dynamics of neuronal activity and the CD of STDP in both spike-based as well as rate-based neuronal network models.

[1]  H. Higashi,et al.  Membrane properties of guinea pig cingulate cortical neurons in vitro. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[3]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[4]  U. Rutishauser,et al.  Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons , 2010, Nature.

[5]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Temporal Sequence Learning, Prediction, and Control: A Review of Different Models and Their Relation to Biological Mechanisms , 2005, Neural Computation.

[6]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Harry Klopf,et al.  A drive-reinforcement model of single neuron function , 1987 .

[8]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Patrick D. Roberts,et al.  Computational Consequences of Temporally Asymmetric Learning Rules: I. Differential Hebbian Learning , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Connectivity reflects coding: a model of voltage-based STDP with homeostasis , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  H. Markram,et al.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Y. Yamaguchi,et al.  A unified view of theta-phase coding in the entorhinal–hippocampal system , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  W. Levy,et al.  Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus , 1983, Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Spine Ca2+ Signaling in Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  L. Nowak,et al.  Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones , 1984, Nature.

[17]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate, Timing, and Cooperativity Jointly Determine Cortical Synaptic Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[18]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Environmental novelty is signaled by reduction of the hippocampal theta frequency , 2008, Hippocampus.

[19]  D. Johnston,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997 .

[20]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Triplets of Spikes in a Model of Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Henry Markram,et al.  Neural Networks with Dynamic Synapses , 1998, Neural Computation.

[22]  B. Kosco Differential Hebbian learning , 1987 .

[23]  E. Izhikevich Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[24]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  P. Dayan,et al.  Matching storage and recall: hippocampal spike timing–dependent plasticity and phase response curves , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Y. Dan,et al.  Contribution of individual spikes in burst-induced long-term synaptic modification. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  How the Shape of Pre- and Postsynaptic Signals Can Influence STDP: A Biophysical Model , 2004, Neural Computation.

[29]  J. Lisman A mechanism for memory storage insensitive to molecular turnover: a bistable autophosphorylating kinase. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  David W. Nauen,et al.  Coactivation and timing-dependent integration of synaptic potentiation and depression , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.