Visualizing the Research Hotspots and Emerging Trends in Neural Tube Defects: A Review

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are among the second most common serious birth defects (1), including anencephalia, encephalocele, rachischisis, et al. affecting approximately 0.2-10 per 1000 established pregnancies in worldwide (1). They result from failure of the neurulation process and constitute a major cause of still birth, and infant death, which remains a major public health burden in developing country (especially in rural areas)(2-4), although the prevalence of NTDs decreased in high-income countries (5, 6). Research about the NTDs has achieved tremendous progress over the last 50 years, which has been the subject of a variety of publications, including epidemiologic studies, clinical reports, and systematic review. However, the scientometric profile and the emerging trends in NTDs are still unknown. Scientometric studies are important to make comprehensive evaluation of the development of certain research fields. In recent years, document co-citation Abstract Background: Neural tube defects (NTDs) are among the second most common serious birth defects and constitute a major cause of infant death. Research about NTDs has achieved tremendous progress over the last 50 years. Methods: Visualization analysis has been used to explore the hot topic and their emerging trends in NTDs research domain. The scientific literature of research for NTDs has been retrieved from Web of ScienceTM Core Collection (1966–2014) databases, and final acquire 9125 related bibliographic records, then analyze time trend, distribution of journals, hot keywords, and try to explore the hot topic and their emerging trends in NTDs research domain using Histcite and CiteSpace. Results: The number of publications about NTDs have shown an increased tendency over the last 50 years although there was on a slight decline. Birth Defects Research Part A published the most articles on NTDs research, followed by Lance and Teratology, and the Lancet had the greatest number of total citations. The largest cited frequency keywords was the “Folate”, followed by “Pregnancy”, “Prevention”, and “Spina bifida”. The research hotspots in NTDs research were homocysteine, anencephaly, and screening. Conclusion: With the help of visualization analysis, we explore a quantitative and efficient way of understanding the NTDs knowledge field.

[1]  Jane A. Evans,et al.  Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Czeizel,et al.  Prevention of the First Occurrence of Neural-Tube Defects by Periconceptional Vitamin Supplementation , 1992 .

[3]  J D Erickson,et al.  Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Jesper W. Schneider,et al.  Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  J M Friedman,et al.  Clinical, genetic, and epidemiological factors in neural tube defects. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  M. J. Harris,et al.  Mouse models for neural tube closure defects. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Why Words and Co-Words Cannot Map the Development of the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  K J Rothman,et al.  Multivitamin/folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the prevalence of neural tube defects. , 1989, JAMA.

[10]  J. Mills,et al.  Homocysteine metabolism in pregnancies complicated by neural-tube defects , 1995, The Lancet.

[11]  Anthony E. Cawkell,et al.  Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization , 2003, J. Documentation.

[12]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  L B Holmes,et al.  Etiologic heterogeneity of neural-tube defects. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M. Gnant,et al.  Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study , 1991, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Matthews,et al.  A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Qin He,et al.  Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[17]  John B. Wallingford,et al.  The Continuing Challenge of Understanding, Preventing, and Treating Neural Tube Defects , 2013, Science.

[18]  He Wang,et al.  Birth defects surveillance in China , 2011, World journal of pediatrics : WJP.

[19]  M. den Heyer,et al.  Mutated methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase as a risk factor for spina bifida , 1995, The Lancet.

[20]  Yuying He,et al.  The Survey of Birth Defects Rate Based on Birth Registration System , 2015, Chinese medical journal.

[21]  Andrew J. Copp,et al.  The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  P Karfunkel,et al.  The mechanisms of neural tube formation. , 1974, International review of cytology.

[23]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[24]  H. Blom,et al.  Maternal hyperhomocysteinemia: a risk factor for neural-tube defects? , 1994, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[25]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law , 2006, Scientometrics.

[26]  Z. Li,et al.  Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defect Prevention. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Jennifer Williams,et al.  Describing the Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects Worldwide: A Systematic Literature Review , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  Y. Yi,et al.  Economic burden of neural tube defects and impact of prevention with folic acid: a literature review , 2011, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[29]  M. Justice,et al.  Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail , 2001, Nature Genetics.