Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students

We investigated whether and how prior knowledge activation improves learning outcomes for high school (less experienced learners) and university students (experienced learners) in a hypertext environment. Map coherence was defined as the extent to which relationships between the concepts in the map were made explicit. Therefore, we classified the mapping task of creating and labelling lines as low-coherent, and the mapping task of labelling provided lines as high-coherent. Learners were randomly assigned to the conditions of (1) high-coherent knowledge activation; (2) low-coherent knowledge activation; and (3) a baseline condition without prior knowledge activation. We found an overall effect for prior knowledge activation, learning experience, and an interaction between learning experience and the coherence of the prior knowledge activation task on learning outcomes. High school students benefited most from labelling provided lines, while university physics majors benefited most from creating and labelling lines. This interaction effect and effects of the specific mapping tasks on process measures support the claim that different prior knowledge activation tasks are suited for different groups of learners.

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results , 1979 .

[2]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? , 2004 .

[3]  Shyan-Ming Yuan,et al.  Students' use of web-based concept map testing and strategies for learning , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[5]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[6]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing , 2002 .

[7]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[8]  R. Shavelson,et al.  On the Validity of Cognitive Interpretations of Scores From Alternative Concept-Mapping Techniques , 2001 .

[9]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The effect of prior knowledge activation on text recall: an investigation of two conflicting hypotheses , 1995 .

[10]  Wilbur S. Ames,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Advance Organizers on Learning and Retention , 1980 .

[11]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[12]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  The neglected role of individual differences in theoretical models of cognitive development , 1998 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  The Use of Hypertext for Learning , 1999 .

[15]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Goal Configurations and Processing Strategies as Moderators Between Instructional Design and Cognitive Load: Evidence From Hypertext-Based Instruction , 2003 .

[16]  Slava Kalyuga.  Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction , 2007 .

[17]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[18]  Robert F. Schuck.  The Impact of Set Induction on Student Achievement and Retention. , 1981 .

[19]  D. McNamara.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[20]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  W. Schneider,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge and Memory Performance: A Comparison of High- and Low-Aptitude Children , 1989 .

[22]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[23]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  How Can We Use Concept Maps for Prior Knowledge Activation - Different Mapping-tasks Lead to Different Cognitive Processes , 2006, ICLS.

[24]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[25]  T. S. Hilbert,et al.  Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? , 2008 .

[26]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The Relevance of Hierarchies to Learning Biology From Hypertext , 1999 .

[27]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances through Meta-Analysis. , 2006 .

[28]  A. Luchins.  Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[29]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web , 1997 .

[30]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  LEARNING FROM HYPERTEXT: RESEARCH ISSUES AND FINDINGS , 2004 .

[31]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Learning From Electronic Texts: Effects of Interactive Overviews for Information Access , 1995 .

[32]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[33]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Hypertext Principles for text and Courseware Design , 1986 .

[34]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. , 1991 .

[35]  Burkhard Priemer,et al.  Students Text-Production Methods when Learning with the Internet , 2004, CELDA.

[36]  G. Salomon.  Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .

[37]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[38]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[39]  Matthias Nückles,et al.  Supporting Concept Mapping for Learning from Text , 2006, ICLS.

[40]  Lih-Juan ChanLin.  Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer-based lesson , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[42]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[44]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[45]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can Be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge Readers , 2007 .

[46]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .