Dragons, Ladybugs, and Softballs: Girls’ STEM Engagement with Human-Centered Robotics

Early experiences in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) are important for getting youth interested in STEM fields, particularly for girls. Here, we explore how an after-school robotics club can provide informal STEM experiences that inspire students to engage with STEM in the future. Human-centered robotics, with its emphasis on the social aspects of science and technology, may be especially important for bringing girls into the STEM pipeline. Using a problem-based approach, we designed two robotics challenges. We focus here on the more extended second challenge, in which participants were asked to imagine and build a telepresence robot that would allow others to explore their space from a distance. This research follows four girls as they engage with human-centered telepresence robotics design. We constructed case studies of these target participants to explore their different forms of engagement and phases of interest development—considering facets of behavioral, social, cognitive, and conceptual-to-consequential engagement as well as stages of interest ranging from triggered interest to well-developed individual interest. The results demonstrated that opportunities to personalize their robots and feedback from peers and facilitators were important motivators. We found both explicit and vicarious engagement and varied interest phases in our group of four focus participants. This first iteration of our project demonstrated that human-centered robotics is a promising approach to getting girls interested and engaged in STEM practices. As we design future iterations of our robotics club environment, we must consider how to harness multiple forms of leadership and engagement without marginalizing students with different working preferences.

[1]  Andrew Shouse,et al.  Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits , 2009 .

[2]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[3]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[4]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .

[5]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Robot Diaries: Broadening Participation in the Computer Science Pipeline through Social Technical Exploration , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science.

[6]  Igor M. Verner,et al.  Robot contest as a laboratory for experiential engineering education , 2004, JERC.

[7]  C. Hmelo‐Silver Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[8]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Planning Early for Careers in Science , 2006, Science.

[9]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Interest and the Development of Pathways to Science , 2015 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  Florence R. Sullivan Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[12]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[13]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  The Impact of Robot Projects on Girl's Attitudes Toward Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[14]  Edna Tan,et al.  Desiring a career in STEM‐related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities‐in‐practice in science , 2013 .

[15]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[16]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  The New Robotics—towards Human-centered Machines , 2007 .

[17]  Place-based Learning , 2014 .

[18]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematics: Gender Differences in Mathematics Self-Efficacy Beliefs , 2004 .

[19]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science , 2012 .

[20]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[21]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten , 2007, C&C '07.

[22]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[23]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  STREAM: A workshop on the use of Robotics in K--12 STEM education [Education] , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[24]  C. Maher,et al.  An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data☆ , 2003 .

[25]  The Effect of an After-School Program Addressing the Gender and Minority Achievement Gaps in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. , 2001 .

[26]  Flávio S. Azevedo Sustaining Interest-Based Participation in Science , 2015 .