Design and evaluation of a novel triaxial isometric trunk muscle strength measurement system

Abstract Maximal strength measurements of the trunk have been used to evaluate the maximum functional capacity of muscles and the potential mechanical overload or overuse of the lumbar spine tissues in order to estimate the risk of developing musculoskeletal injuries. A new triaxial isometric trunk strength measurement system was designed and developed in the present study, and its reliability and performance was investigated. The system consisted of three main revolute joints, equipped with torque sensors, which intersect at L5—S1 and adjustment facilities to fit the body anthropometry and to accommodate both symmetric and asymmetric postures in both seated and standing positions. The dynamics of the system was formulated to resolve validly the moment generated by trunk muscles in the three anatomic planes. The optimal gain and offset of the system were obtained using deadweights based on the least-squares linear regression analysis. The R2 results of calibration for all loading courses of all joints were higher than 0.99, which indicated an excellent linear correlation. The results of the validation analysis of the regression model suggested that the mean absolute error and the r.m.s. error were less than 2 per cent of the applied load. The maximum value of the minimum detectable change was found to be 1.63 N m for the sagittal plane torque measurement, 0.8 per cent of the full-scale load. The trial-to-trial variability analysis of the device using deadweights provided intra-class correlation coefficients of higher than 0.99, suggesting excellent reliability. The cross-talk analysis of the device indicated maximum cross-talks of 1.7 per cent and 3.4 per cent when the system was subjected to flexion—extension and lateral bending torques respectively. The trial-to-trial variability of the system during in-vivo strength measurement tests resulted in good to excellent reliability, with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.69 to 0.91. The results of the maximum voluntary isometric torques exertion measurements for 30 subjects indicated good agreement with the previously published data in the literature. The extensive capabilities and high reliability of the system are promising for more comprehensive investigations on the trunk biomechanics in future, e.g. isometric strength measurement at symmetric and asymmetric postures, muscle endurance, and recruitment pattern analysis.

[1]  M. Nordin,et al.  1988 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: The Triaxial Coupling of Torque Generation of Trunk Muscles during Isometric Exertions and the Effect of Fatiguing Isoinertial Movements on the Motor Output and Movement Patterns , 1988, Spine.

[2]  S. T. Pheasant,et al.  Bodyspace : anthropometry, ergonomics and design , 1986 .

[3]  Hege R. Eriksen,et al.  Prevalence of low back pain and sickness absence: A ``borderline'' study in Norway and Sweden , 2006, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[4]  M. Nordin,et al.  Capability and recruitment patterns of trunk during isometric uniaxial and biaxial upright exertion. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  S. Schneider,et al.  Comorbidity of low back pain: Representative outcomes of a national health study in the Federal Republic of Germany , 2007, European journal of pain.

[6]  M. Mohseni-Bandpei,et al.  Nonspecific Low Back Pain in 5000 Iranian School-age Children , 2007, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  M. Nordin,et al.  A Database of Isoinertial Trunk Strength Tests against Three Resistance Levels in Sagittal, Frontal, and Transverse Planes in Normal Male Subjects , 1989, Spine.

[8]  Y. Lee,et al.  Factor structure of trunk performance data for healthy subjects. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[10]  R. Seeds,et al.  Normative Data for Isostation B100 , 1987 .

[11]  Shrawan Kumar Isolated planar trunk strengths measurement in normals: Part III — Results and database , 1996 .

[12]  L. Manchikanti Epidemiology of low back pain. , 2000, Pain physician.

[13]  W. E. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Flexion and Rotation of the Trunk and Lifting at Work Are Risk Factors for Low Back Pain: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study , 2000, Spine.

[14]  M Parnianpour,et al.  The effects of resistance level on muscle coordination patterns and movement profile during trunk extension. , 1993, Spine.

[15]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Relationships between preferred and maximum effort low-back motion. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  John J. Craig Zhu,et al.  Introduction to robotics mechanics and control , 1991 .

[17]  W. Marras,et al.  Trunk muscle activities during asymmetric twisting motions. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  A. Nachemson,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of Preemployment Screening Methods for Acute Industrial Back Pain , 1992, Spine.

[19]  G. Davies,et al.  Trunk Testing Using a Prototype Cybex II lsokinetic Dynamometer Stabilization System. , 1982, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[20]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Relative efficiency of abdominal muscles in spine stability , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[23]  Mohamad Parnianpour,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT STUDY OF THE INTRACTION OF SPINE, IAP AND SURROUNDING MUSCLES , 2007 .

[24]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF AN APPARATUS FOR TRI-AXIAL MEASUREMENT OF LUMBAR TORQUES IN ISOMETRIC MODE , 2010 .

[25]  W S Marras,et al.  Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low‐level trunk acceleration , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  D. Warwick,et al.  Trunk Strengths in Attempted Flexion, Extension, and Lateral Bending in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Low‐Back Disorders , 1980, Spine.

[27]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  A NEW APPARATUS FOR TRIAXIAL MEASUREMENT OF LUMBAR MOMENTS IN ISOMETRIC MODE , 2007 .

[28]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  An electromyography-assisted model to estimate trunk muscle forces during fatiguing repetitive trunk exertions. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  C Larivière,et al.  A triaxial dynamometer to monitor lateral bending and axial rotation moments during static trunk extension efforts. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  J. Malchaire,et al.  Isometric and Dynamic Performances of the Trunk and Associated Factors , 1995, Spine.

[31]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  The Effect of Angle and Level of Exertion on Trunk Neuromuscular Performance During Multidirectional Isometric Activities , 2009, Spine.

[32]  Isometric maximal and submaximal trunk extension at different flexed positions in standing. Triaxial torque output and EMG. , 1993, Spine.

[33]  K A Khalaf,et al.  Modeling of functional trunk muscle performance: interfacing ergonomics and spine rehabilitation in response to the ADA. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  Applications of Quantitative Assessment Human Performance in Occupational Medicine , 1999 .

[35]  P J Sparto,et al.  Estimation of Trunk Muscle Forces and Spinal Loads During Fatiguing Repetitive Trunk Exertions , 1998, Spine.