The third contender: A critical examination of the Dynamicist theory of cognition

Abstract In a recent series of publications, dynamicist researchers have proposed a new conception of cognitive functioning. This conception is intended to replace the currently dominant theories of connectionism and symbolicism. The dynamicist approach to cognitive modeling employs concepts developed in the mathematical field of dynamical systems theory. They claim that cognitive models should be embedded, low‐dimensional, complex, described by coupled differential equations, and non‐representational. In this paper I begin with a short description of the dynamicist project and its role as a cognitive theory. Subsequently, I determine the theoretical commitments of dynamicists, critically examine those commitments and discuss current examples of dynamicist models. In conclusion, I determine dynamicism's relation to symbolicism and connectionism and find that the dynamicist goal to establish a new paradigm has yet to be realized.

[1]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work , 1990, Cognition.

[2]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[3]  W. Freeman,et al.  How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  T. Gelder,et al.  It's about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition , 1996 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[6]  R. Bogartz,et al.  The future of dynamic systems models in developmental psychology in the light of the past. , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[8]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[9]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  James Gleick Chaos: Making a New Science , 1987 .

[11]  G. Globus Toward a Noncomputational Cognitive Neuroscience , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Mary Hesse,et al.  Models and analogies in science , 1970 .

[13]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Neural networks simulation of a discrete model of continious effects of irrelevant stimuli , 1990 .

[14]  T. Gelder,et al.  What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? , 1995 .

[15]  William Bechtel,et al.  Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks , 1991 .

[16]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  Models of central capacity and concurrency , 1984 .

[17]  Mary Hesse,et al.  THEORIES, FAMILY RESEMBLANCES AND ANALOGY , 1988 .

[18]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The Computational Brain , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior , 1980 .

[20]  H A SIMON,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING IN COMPUTER AND MAN. , 1964, American scientist.

[21]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Don’t be fazed by PHASER: Beginning exploration of a cyclical motivational system , 1992 .

[22]  Andrew J. Meade,et al.  Solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations by feedforward neural networks , 1994 .

[23]  Paul van Geer The Dynamics of Father Brown: Essay Review of "A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action," by E. Thelen and L. B. Smith. , 1996 .

[24]  Nancy Cartwright,et al.  Fables and Models , 1991 .

[25]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[26]  Noretta Koertge,et al.  Explanation and its Problems* , 1992, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[27]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Recursive Distributed Representations , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[30]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[31]  S. Kosslyn Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate , 1994 .

[32]  P. L. C. Van Geert The dynamics of Father Brown , 1996 .

[33]  Scott Barton Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. , 1994 .

[34]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[35]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[36]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[37]  P. Smolensky On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.